GA review

edit

200.68.129.144, according to the GA rules, only editors who have registered accounts are allowed to open a Good Article review of a nominated article, and it is strongly advised that the editor have been actively editing for several months and have experience with articles of GA quality before attempting their first review. The review you opened in the past 24 hours has been taken over by another reviewer, since you weren't eligible to be a reviewer. Thank you for your understanding. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:51, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

@BlueMoonset: it was me, who forgot to log in. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 08:22, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

July 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bug tracking system have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:07, 29 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi 200.68.129.144! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, I'm very disappointed with you, guys, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 14 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

September 2023

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Talk:Library Network of Western Switzerland, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:28, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.