1Tytonidae1

1Tytonidae1, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi 1Tytonidae1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:13, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

January 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Denver Art Museum, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

• Copying text from other sources
• Policy on copyright
• Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
• Policy and guideline on non-free content

If you still have questions, there is the teahouse, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 12:55, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Fantasy A for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fantasy A is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fantasy A until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:59, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Norman Lewis (March 6)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by SounderBruce was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

SounderBruce 00:57, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

Hello 1Tytonidae1. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Northwest Film Forum, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:1Tytonidae1. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=1Tytonidae1|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 09:00, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, I don't have a financial stake in editing these articles! I live in Seattle and enjoy local film, cinemas, and festivals. I was really surprised by how few articles there are related to Pacific Northwest film and film institutions and I'm trying to remedy that. The Northwest Film Forum is a nonprofit which I am wholly unaffiliated with; I was just surprised that they weren't represented on Wikipedia, because they definitely should be. I'm working on an article right now for the Tacoma Film Festival, which I am also wholly unaffiliated with. I don't know how to prove that I'm not being paid. I don't have much experience on Wikipedia and am enjoying learning and contributing; I think the few articles I've created are quite objective, neutral in style, and well referenced. I like the concept of crowdsourcing and I enjoy researching and finding old news articles to use as references, etc. 1Tytonidae1 (talk) 09:10, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

So the reason I asked is because you are claiming the pictures that you uploaded(including the NWFF logo) are your own personal work. If you didn't personally take the images, they will need to be removed from articles/drafts and their deletion requested from Commons. Logos typically must be uploaded under "fair use" rules to this Wikipedia locally- though a logo that is mostly words may be okay- but you still can't claim it as your own personal work. I didn't see a copyright notice on the NWFF website so it must be assumed that the logo is copyrighted. 331dot (talk) 09:33, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Oh, I see. I should have refrained from adding the logo then. Thanks for explaining! I can remove it. 1Tytonidae1 (talk) 09:35, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

So you did take this image?

The easiest way to upload an image is to be the photographer, then you can waive the copyright to it or otherwise allow it to be used on Wikipedia. If you didn't take the image, it may be possible to upload it but it is harder as you will need to show that the image was released under a copyright compatible with Wikipedia(allowing for reuse for any purpose with attribution) or that the copriright holder(usually the photographer) released the image for use. 331dot (talk) 09:39, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

No, I didn't. I'm reading up now on image use policy and, until I fully grasp this, I am going to refrain from uploading images. Thank you for pointing this out and explaining. 1Tytonidae1 (talk) 09:57, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. 331dot (talk) 10:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spokane International Film Festival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richland. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

You have used sources that are either clearly noted as paid placement, unmarked press releases or marketing content, or blatant fake content farms which house unmarked SEO placement. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. These sources step far beyond those policies. Please carefully evaluate your references in the future, and ensure that you are in compliance with our mandatory paid editing disclosures. Sam Kuru (talk) 15:46, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Which source is this in reference to? I did not use a bad source intentionally. 1Tytonidae1 (talk) 05:47, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

• usawire.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://spam.usawire.com