1OA9
Joined 9 August 2022
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Callanecc in topic Blocked as a sockpuppet
| This is 1OA9's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
February 2023
edit
Hello, I'm Sakura emad. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Urvashi Chaudhary, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —— 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 15:22, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- Greetings, Sakura emad I did a cleanup for now, of unreliable sources and promotional content. I have placed the page on my watch list. I will work on it later. For now, I left the content which, I believe, I might find sources for, later, when I will find the time for it. 1OA9 (talk) 15:53, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- thanks @1OA9-san, i saw you removing sourced content from the page and tagging it {{unreferenced}} i didn't understand why you do this, so i reverted it back to previous version. —— 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 15:56, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- Ok. @Sakura emad-Chan, those sources were bogus. Thanks. Should I do the cleanup again? 1OA9 (talk) 16:15, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- replied on my user-talk page. —— 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 16:27, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- Ok. @Sakura emad-Chan, those sources were bogus. Thanks. Should I do the cleanup again? 1OA9 (talk) 16:15, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- thanks @1OA9-san, i saw you removing sourced content from the page and tagging it {{unreferenced}} i didn't understand why you do this, so i reverted it back to previous version. —— 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 15:56, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Zed J Alexander per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zed J Alexander. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:16, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.