April 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm MaxBrowne. An edit that you recently made to Comparison of top chess players throughout history seemed to be a test. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!MaxBrowne (talk) 01:22, 17 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

August 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm Haminoon. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to At Peace because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Haminoon (talk) 06:24, 27 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

January 2016 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tzigane. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BRPever (talk) 17:02, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to Gujarat seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:19, 3 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

November 2017 edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Military strategy. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. BusterD (talk) 14:13, 16 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm Person who formerly started with "216". Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Vertical exaggeration seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Person who formerly started with "216" (talk) 15:27, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

December 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm Abelmoschus Esculentus. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to American Samoa— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Abelmoschus Esculentus talk / contribs 01:25, 15 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Guam. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Abelmoschus Esculentus talk / contribs 01:25, 15 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to School of Rock, you may be blocked from editing. Abelmoschus Esculentus talk / contribs 01:27, 15 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Oscar the Grouch. Abelmoschus Esculentus talk / contribs 01:29, 15 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

Alexf(talk) 01:46, 15 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Comments: Blocked for 1 week.

March 2019 edit

  Hello, I'm Teratix. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Wetzel's Pretzels seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Teratix 23:16, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.