197.211.53.244

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

197.211.53.244 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i have been blocked as: sock puppet, by the globally block, i understand what i was blocked for, i will not continue to disrupt, i will make a useful contribution instead, i will write a constructive article, Name: jesmion email: (Redacted) 197.211.53.240 (talk) 07:48, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Firstly, to request a global unblock you should follow the link given below. Administrators on English Wikipedia are unable to lift a global block. Secondly, to request an unblock of your account you need to log into that account: we can't just assume that someone who edits anonymously and claims to be the person behind an account actually is that person, as we frequently get people making false claims as to who they are. I also see that, even apart from this unblock request, you have been editing without logging in at least up to a few weeks ago, maybe more recently than that. If you are blocked for (amongst other things) sockpuppetry, blatantly and visibly evading the block and then requesting an unblock is not the best way to get unblocked. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request unblock at m:Steward requests/Global#Requests for global (un)block. I have redacted your email address in the request above. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 09:20, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

February 2017

Hello, I'm TheFrog001. I noticed that in this edit to BS 7671, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TheFrog001 (talk) 19:33, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to BS 7671, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Pinkshrimp (talk) 19:41, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2019

Hello, I'm Baden-Paul. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to The Whole Nine Yards (film)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Baden-Paul (talk) 10:35, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Okpella. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Carl Tristan Orense 02:15, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Okpella, you may be blocked from editing. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:30, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2019

Hello, I'm Promethean. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Complement (set theory)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Promethean (talk) 13:04, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Samuel Ioraer Ortom. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Begoon 10:58, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

---