194.80.104.51

This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.
March 2007 Thank you for experimenting with the page Donaghcloney on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Kubigula (talk) 19:07, 14 March 2007 (UTC) Gerry Adams Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Domer48 (talk) 13:03, 17 April 2008 (UTC) May 2009 Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Marcas Ó Murchú, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mild Bill Hiccup (talk) 12:04, 13 May 2009 (UTC) November 2009 Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Yossi Benayoun has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.  – iridescent 11:16, 20 November 2009 (UTC) January 2010 You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Gilliam (talk) 03:04, 19 January 2010 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. March 2010 Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Pasta has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 17:19, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

May 2014

Your edit to Badger has been reverted as it's not constructive to the article. Your claims are unsourced, and not in any way substantiated by other material within the article. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:10, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Badger, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.
While you did add a reference this time, you misrepresented what is actually contained in that reference. Even if it supported the material you are trying to add (which it doesn't), the behaviour in the news article is clearly listed as non-typical behaviour. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:18, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Ah go on, I reckon they can break a man's arm. They're tough wee fellows. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.80.104.51 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 6 May 2014‎

What you "reckon" would fall under what Wikipedia calls original research, and is not acceptable as grounds for supporting content additions to articles. You need third-party reliable sources. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:22, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

I have a mate who knows quite a bit about badgers, in fact he used to be one I hear, and he broke another guys arm on a night out once. There's a Facebook status about this, could I perhaps reference that?

No, now you're firmly in the realm of vandalism. Further disruption will result in a block. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:29, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Oh, I see. I guess I'd better take a 'break' from Wikipedia then. Get it?

I was just having a bit of ARMless fun.

Okay, I'll stop badgering you now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.80.104.51 (talk • contribs) 00:43, 6 May 2014‎

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  - Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:25, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

194.80.104.51 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I can vouch for Keith Badgerington, he's a top-notch lad. He didn't mean to break that wee lad's arm, and even visited him in hospital with chocolate to apologise! But as every cloud has its silver lining, I feel Keith's somewhat unorthodox contribution to science should be recognised. That is, badgers can break a man's arm. Just like penicillin, it was discovered under the influence of copious amounts of alcohol by accident, and I reckon if Big Al Flemdog referenced his Facebook page, you'd 'OK' it.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. [stwalkerster|talk] 19:43, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

194.80.104.51 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Ah go on, I'll give you $5.

Decline reason:

No. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:52, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

194.80.104.51 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hey Tony (can I call you that?), that's a relief! I'm a little bit short at the minute, and was hoping to use that $5 for a small pizza, or perhaps one of those tasty double cheeseburgers from McDonald's, or as they call them, a quarterpounder with cheese. I don't suppose I could have a chat to Mr. Wikipedia about this?~

Decline reason:

No. Talk page access revoked. Kinu ^t/_c 20:09, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

November 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Accrington Stanley F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Galebazz (talk) 12:04, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2023

Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I noticed that you made a change to an article, D. Michael Lindsay, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 23:41, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Coleraine Academical Institution, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Knitsey (talk) 18:58, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2024

Hello, I'm Joyous!. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tommy McGuigan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joyous! Noise! 13:52, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---