July 2011 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Indiana Jones, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Indiana Jones was changed by 192.68.112.170 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.897948 on 2011-07-18T17:32:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:32, 18 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

September 2011 edit

  Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Oneida Baptist Institute worked, and it has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Acdixon (talk contribs count) 17:50, 7 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Oneida Baptist Institute, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Acdixon (talk contribs count) 19:13, 7 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

November 2011 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cake, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cake was changed by 192.68.112.170 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.867979 on 2011-11-02T00:54:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:54, 2 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

March 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm SweetCanadianMullet. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Colin Cowherd have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SweetCanadianMullet 00:48, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2017 edit

  This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Mohammed Noor ‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Scatter-gun posting about the wrong person is a serious breach of WP:BLP Andy Dingley (talk) 19:32, 17 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
WP:AGF bitch. 192.68.112.170 (talk) 04:00, 5 November 2018 (UTC)Reply


January 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Flag of South Korea— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:37, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

September 2018 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John F. Kennedy, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization Talk 00:23, 16 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2018 edit

  Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Materialscientist (talk) 03:39, 26 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Why? edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

192.68.112.170 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I see some incidences of vandalism in contribution history. But what is so serious as to block the whole school for six months without elevated warnings? We were trying to have a session on contributing non-profit projects including Wikipedia. But we can't do so because everything is blocked.

Decline reason:

"AGF Bitch". You are   Technically indistinguishable to that specific editor while all of the other machines in use on that IP are unique. If you were going to have a session then you may log into your account and contact me via email and we can discuss further. No negotiations will take place with an anon IP.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 10:43, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That doesn't make sense. It's on this talk page. You seem to be trying to justify the block rather than reasoning. At least Only Warning template should be used. Moreover, a block should escalate before a 6 months block. See WP:NOPUNISH. 192.68.112.170 (talk) 13:15, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
You don't understand. I'm not justifying the original block at all but rather that I'm identifying that discussion won't be happening here because you match that user. Like I said, you can sign into an account and email me but we don't negotiate with anons that claim to have authority.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 13:25, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2018 edit

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of Fri, 26 Apr 2019 03:39:34 GMT for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 13:25, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.