MfD nomination of Talk:Jo Slota

edit

Talk:Jo Slota, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Jo Slota and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Jo Slota during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:17, 7 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

August 2012

edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Classic Albums, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 00:16, 5 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

November 2012

edit

  Hello, I'm James086. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Illegal immigration without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, James086Talk 21:25, 21 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

March 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm 4twenty42o. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Like Minds, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, 4twenty42o (talk) 20:13, 25 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

April 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Pinethicket. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Red-tailed Hawk without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Pinethicket (talk) 22:24, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

October 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm EuroCarGT. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to University of Vermont because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ///EuroCarGT 23:45, 21 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to John Marshall because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! K6ka (talk) 21:44, 1 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2014

edit

Your edits to May 12

edit

Some of your edits on the page May 12 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.
The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 00:32, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2014

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Lovari, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. RashersTierney (talk) 02:51, 7 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2014

edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Webserver directory index, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 13 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

March 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Joe Redington— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 01:08, 27 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

June 2015

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Dwpaul Talk 01:33, 2 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2015

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cardiac muscle cell. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GABHello! 19:52, 21 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Roger Williams— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

October 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to Chantry House, Bunbury seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:01, 26 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

August 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Graham v. Connor have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 15:08, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply