June 2007 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created, Talk: Basic Emotions, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. slakr 18:28, 26 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Basic Emotions edit

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Talk:Basic Emotions, by Greeves (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Talk:Basic Emotions is pure vandalism; this includes redirects created during cleanup of page move vandalism.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Talk:Basic Emotions, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Talk:Basic Emotions itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:49, 26 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of LSU Athletic Hall of Fame edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article LSU Athletic Hall of Fame, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.--..BlackThorTalkContribs 09:21, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

October 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Insulin pump has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Oliver202 (talk) 16:29, 23 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Inuit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JamesAM (talk) 05:17, 1 November 2008 (UTC)Reply


  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to vitamin K. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:34, 20 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

December 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Security guard has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Cheers. Trance addict - Armin van Buuren - Oceanlab 19:27, 12 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

  The recent edit you made to Security guard constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Mygerardromance (talk) 19:27, 12 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Takeru Kobayashi. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Knock off the double entendre on "WEINER", it's old, stale, musty and not one bit funny. Kosh Naluboutes, Nalubotes Aeria gloris, Aeria gloris 17:55, 12 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Takeru Kobayashi, you will be blocked from editing. Kosh Naluboutes, Nalubotes Aeria gloris, Aeria gloris 17:58, 12 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

February 2009 edit

  This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Takeru Kobayashi. Queenie Talk 17:59, 12 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Takeru Kobayashi. Kosh Naluboutes, Nalubotes Aeria gloris, Aeria gloris 18:22, 12 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

June 2009 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:The Huffington Post, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ► RATEL ◄ 14:49, 1 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

February 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page North Hollywood shootout has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 16:57, 9 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

June 2010 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kundalini syndrome. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. The Utahraptor Talk 14:17, 3 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2011 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Montel Williams, you may be blocked from editing. LuftWaffle0 (talk) 05:41, 10 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

May 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Mechanical ventilation— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStartalk 12:24, 29 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Fibromyalgia— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 07:49, 28 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Fibromyalgia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 08:34, 28 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

December 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Gilliam. An edit that you recently made to Tietze syndrome seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! – Gilliam (talk) 15:18, 4 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2018 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Psoas sign has been reverted.
Your edit here to Psoas sign was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0a0PCwsVQ4) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:19, 20 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Fight stats are wrong edit

Several fights are wrong. He lost the rematch to Silva He lost to Jon Jones He lost to Rashad Evans http://ufcstats.com/fighter-details/48d1f690b763934c