Welcome! edit

Hello, 188.93.243.189, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -----Snowded TALK 22:28, 28 June 2019 (UTC)Reply


June 2019 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Evander Holyfield, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Nigos (t@lk Contribs) 10:28, 28 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
I see your point. Ok, instead I’ll warn potential reviewers that they’re dealing with a vandal under investigation. 188.93.243.189 (talkcontribs) 10:32, 28 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
Did it.188.93.243.189 (talkcontribs) 10:37, 28 June 2019 (UTC)Reply


 

Your recent editing history at Russia men's national ice hockey team shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -----Snowded TALK 22:16, 28 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for reaching out. I hope the discussion about this politically motivated user and my actions to stop him will help to understand what’s going on. The discussion is here. 188.93.243.189 (talkcontribs) 22:22, 28 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
That is NOT the place to have a discussion - use the talk page of the article itself -----Snowded TALK 22:25, 28 June 2019 (UTC)Reply