188.194.27.215

Egtved Girl edits

Hello, and thank you for your efforts on the above article. Please take a look at the guidance on how to cite sources (Wikipedia:Citing_sources). We don't tend to put as much source info in the article body as you did. For instance, you might try something like "In an August 2019 article, Sophie Bergerbrant challenged the conclusions...". There's no need to include the article title and publisher in the sentence; they will be easily visible to the reader if you use the appropriate template to cite the source. For the source you cite, this template would be helpful: {{Cite web}}. Eric ^talk 08:18, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

FYI to anonymous editor: I added a mention of Bergebrant's article. See Egtved_Girl#Origin_and_life_of_Egtved_Girl, referencing the article itself as the source rather than the less well-written post on the phys.org site, which has a lot of cheesy ads. Eric ^talk 18:06, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

as the source is not available, you didn't really improve anything --188.194.27.215 (talk) 16:17, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

I've reverted your edit. The source is certainly accessible, and I certainly introduced the information more carefully than you did. Please stop your contentious editing. Eric ^talk 21:11, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

I rechecked and noticed it was a problem at my side. Now that I was able to see the source I remember looking into that source too when I made the original edit which you reverted twice. My edit was not contentious, stop assuming bad things just because I am not logged in. --188.194.27.215 (talk) 21:29, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Glad you could see the source. Sorry if you found my tone to be less than collegial. Though the anonymous editing can make communication more difficult, and I'm not a fan of it, I'm not "assuming bad things" because of that. Your tone above and on my talkpage last month, as well as your hastiness in adding the Bergebrant material, might have taxed my patience a bit, that's all. Hope you find my addition of the material to be well presented. My main motivation for doing it was the fact that I had told you last month that I would, and I thought your idea to mention her work constituted an improvement to the article. Eric ^talk 22:02, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

January 2020

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Lorris, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:40, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---