December 2021 edit

  Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mart Crowley, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 20:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

188.142.179.15 (talk) 20:11, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Joseph Gordon-Levitt. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:37, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

188.142.179.15 (talk) 20:11, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Rare disease edit edit

On my talk page, you said: Could you please explain to me, why my edit is not constructive? In the reference Table-2 lists the countries in the "Patient ratio" columns, all are included to the article table, except Norway and Switzerland. I think it is not really important to list them individually, as they are part of the European Economic Area. But please, who and on what principles decide to omit these countries? Thanxs.

First, it seemed you were "splitting hairs" to differentiate Norway and Switzerland as apart from Europe vs. the EEA. I agree it is not the intent of an encyclopedia article to show everything, WP:NOTEVERYTHING. Second, you wrote a grammatically incorrect and misspelled sentence: "Norway and Switzerland are also maintaine the same ratio", which seemed careless and unconstructive. Sorry, I fail to see your point in raising this issue. Zefr (talk) 00:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Zefr: Ok, my be it was incorrect, I am not a native English speaker. My point is, that it is odd to me, why the article is listing only these countries in its table. Why Panama is so important to list, while eg. China, India and Japan not. The logic behind of the table is in the reference given, because only those countries are listed, which has this kind of definition of ratio in the given column. So if this is the logic, then Norway and Switzerland should not be omitted. So I add these then as separate lines, to avoid "splitting hairs", as the same way as UK was added also to the table when exited from EU. 188.142.179.15 (talk) 10:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply