Please try to make useful edits

edit

Hi! I appreciate your edits, but the permanent change of letters of words, which have no defined name is absurd. (e.g.rong to roong).This is mere playing around. Please try to give informative content, ideally with the necessary sources.


Romanization Of Khmer language

It is not very useful for the common cause, to ponder with names of locations in Cambodia. There are two authorities for the Romanization of Khmer. The IPA and the UNGEGN, (e.g. Koh, Kaoh) have differing spelling systems and most of the Cambodian names are not exactly defined. There are (in some cases 4 to 5) many claims on how to spell a particular name, often created by individuals. Please, as i presume you are Cambodian, try to help by delivering facts - facts that aren't present yet - which are somehow verifiable - this would be very great. I can help you, if you like. We can bring them into a presentable form and i make sure they have the proper reference. Just contact me here or on my talk page.Wikirictor (talk) 00:58, 2 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

January 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Allthefoxes. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Paid to click seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --allthefoxes (Talk) 20:29, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Paid to click. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. --allthefoxes (Talk) 20:31, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, but

edit

Thank you for your contributions, however, please read our guide on reliable sources and the neutral point of view --allthefoxes (Talk) 20:31, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

August 2019

edit

  Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you were at Joe Esposito (mobster). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Next256 (talk) 16:56, 11 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.