February 2022 edit

 

Your recent editing history at Ronnie O'Sullivan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 11:09, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I tried talking to you on your page by leaving a message did you reply to it ?. instead of sending me this ?. Did you send the same to Nigej for waring editing ?. Very curious to know pal ?. 178.167.199.22 (talk) 12:47, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

No one else has broken our rules. Please gain consensus before making changes. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 14:53, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

By the way Lee who do you think you are ?. People are free to add any event they want in any sport with or without a source and do not ask permission. And they do it all the time, but you seem to think you run the snooker pages. Do you have any details if copyright? 178.167.199.22 (talk) 18:45, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

They are not your rules btw you do not own Wikipedia. Who said you are right to remove any content of any event that is put up with a source attached ?. Did you seek anyone's permission to remove sourced content ?. Did you seek consensus from people or did you take it upon yourself to remove items ?. What or whom gives you the right to dictate to people about their edits ?. I would welcome any explanation please ?. Many thanks 178.167.199.22 (talk) 18:30, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Try reading Wikipedia:Consensus. wjematherplease leave a message... 18:36, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Was I writing to you or did I ask for your opinion ?. No so do not message me 178.167.199.22 (talk) 18:40, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

You may also wish to consider WP:BLOCKEVASION: "Anyone is free to revert any edits made in violation of a block, without giving any further reason and without regard to the three-revert rule." wjematherplease leave a message... 18:56, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disruptive editing (TMDR) edit

You are more than aware that the relevant discussion is a WT:GOLF, where you have failed to gain consensus for incorporating your personal opinions. Persisting with pushing your point of view at different venues (e.g. individual user talk pages) with the hope of getting a different response is disruptive. Please stop. wjematherplease leave a message... 17:26, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Where did I fail to gain consensus ?. I never even tried I think you are slightly out of touch there. Go back and have a look good man. I said I have multiple sources that show that event was a charity exhibition including from the co host Sky Sports, but did I post a link ?. No I did not bother because you are your cronies are all the same and will twist everything to suit yourselves. That is the way you operate 178.167.199.22 (talk) 18:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

This was your latest contribution to the discussion. Or was that not you? wjematherplease leave a message... 18:53, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

February 2022 edit

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for block evasion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:44, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.