October 2018 edit

  This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.


  Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 20:26, 9 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  – Gilliam (talk) 20:27, 9 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Deli nk (talk) 15:51, 12 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

174.60.119.235 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not gonna make vandalism or disruptive edits again if you unblock me. I'm just for now gonna ask questions at the teahouse and discuss and answer question on talk pages. 174.60.119.235 (talk) 15:49, 13 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your request as I don't feel you have the necessary knowledge to answer Teahouse questions. While asking questions before you start is a good idea, you need to give some indication of how unblocking you improves this project, such as by indicating what articles you want to edit. 331dot (talk) 16:01, 13 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


how do i unblock without getting declined?

You read the Guide to Appealing Blocks and follow the advice there. 331dot (talk) 18:55, 25 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 17:18, 26 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

174.60.119.235 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The reason makes sense and if you unblock me, I promise I will stop this, for a long time (at least) 174.60.119.235 (talk) 17:25, 26 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You've promised that before, back on October 13th. You've shown we can't trust your word. This block is appropriate, your edits were disruptive even after previously promising to stop. Yamla (talk) 17:29, 26 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I read the guide to apealling blocks and tried unblocking and i got declined too. But how do I unblock in another way? Note: cannot do form thingy because that site is not approved yet due to parential controls (set up because i'm a kid). also must be on wikipedia.}}

If you are referring to the Unblock Ticket system, you don't need to use it, as you still have access to this page. If you read the guide to appealing blocks, then you should be able to make a new unblock request. 331dot (talk) 14:06, 8 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
That said, if for some reason you lose access to this page and need to use UTRS, Wikipedia has no control over your parents or guardian restricting your internet use. You will need to speak to them if necessary; but again, you can still make a request here. 331dot (talk) 14:08, 8 November 2018 (UTC)Reply