April 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Sale of the Century (US game show) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. WikiLubber (talk) 20:34, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Caesars Challenge has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. 97.103.116.216 (talk) 10:12, 30 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Child's Play (game show) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. WikiLubber (talk) 11:55, 2 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

May 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edits that you made to the page Sale of the Century (US game show) have been reverted, as they appear to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. 97.103.116.216 (talk) 10:13, 7 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

June 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edits that you made to the page Card Sharks have been reverted, as they appear to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. 97.103.116.151 (talk) 15:02, 10 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Card Sharks edit

Thanks for making at least some edits to the article above. I really appreciate any improvements that people make to the article. It needs a lot of work doing to it :) Chevymontecarlo 17:50, 11 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Kevin Lepage, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.   — Jeff G. ツ 05:07, 16 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

July 2010 edit

  Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to List of Annoying Orange episodes. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Active Banana (talk) 22:16, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Read our policies on original research and verification. Anything that is NOT obvious to any viewer must be sourced. That the pasta is a parody of a particular individual goes beyond "obvious" and requires a third party to make the claim. Active Banana (talk) 22:26, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Goodfaith editors follow our policies and supply sources for their claims. Please revert yourself or provide appropriate sourcing now.Active Banana (talk) 22:31, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
There are no threats. merely statements of our policy and what happens to those who choose not to follow them. If you choose to continue to insert unsourced orignal research against policy, you WILL be blocked. Please revert yourself so this doesnt happen.Active Banana (talk) 22:36, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
"Extenuating circumstances" ... like??? "I don't want to follow the policies" or is there something else? Active Banana (talk) 22:38, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Our policy if no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article. there is no - "well if there are never going to be third party sources, then the article doesnt need them" execeptions. Active Banana (talk) 22:52, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for reverting the article to a state that more closely aligns with our policies! Active Banana (talk) 22:55, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply