173.48.197.65

December 2018

Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Medea Benjamin, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:02, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2019

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for pushing an agenda which is not compatible with the task of writing and maintaining a neutral encyclopaedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:32, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

April 2019

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Block: one month Vsmith (talk) 11:14, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Unblock|| My edit are not pc but they are constructive.[[Special:Contributions/173.48.197.

May 2019

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Seeing that your one-month block expired only yesterday and you are making the exact same kind of disruptive edits, you only need one warning - stop trolling or your next block will probably be longer. bonadea contributions talk 10:12, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

19:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Yamla (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Doug Weller talk 10:54, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

I have broken no rules. Look instead to the administrators who are.173.48.197.65 (talk) 22:12, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:06, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for continued disruptive and POV edits on Medea Benjamin, as done at Medea Benjamin.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  EvergreenFir (talk) 22:22, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

{{ unblock| It seems to be a contiued block. I put a post on a talk page on Bill Koch and I am blocked.173.48.197.65 (talk) 15:16, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

173.48.197.65 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am being blocked with no explanation or warning.

Decline reason:

The block is in place to prevent you from popping in to Wikipedia every so often to push an agenda and make the same POV comments. This talk page, as well as your block log, explain why the block is necessary. As the block is preventing continued disruption there is no reason to lift it. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:33, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

173.48.197.65 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

What disruption. Acotereon has no right to block. He has been reported on as a administrator who violates the rules.173.48.197.65 (talk) 19:11, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:17, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

173.48.197.65 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was never given a reason or an explanation on why my constructive additions mostly to talk pages were considered disruptive, this is admin abuse.

Decline reason:

No, it isn't; it's entirely appropriate. We can all see the continual insertion of non-WP:NPOV material from your IP. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 23:38, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

173.48.197.65 (talk) 23:32, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

You keep saying that but you have yet to give an example.173.48.197.65 (talk) 18:00, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

---