To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

February 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Photon, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 04:19, 23 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 04:35, 23 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Electromagnetic radiation. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 05:22, 23 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Supergravity. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 05:22, 23 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Loop quantum gravity. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 05:23, 23 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Chameleon particle. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 05:23, 23 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 05:31, 23 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

March 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm Amaury. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Cosmic microwave background— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Amaury (talk) 21:51, 9 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cosmic microwave background with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Amaury (talk) 21:55, 9 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Wtmitchell with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury (talk) 22:00, 9 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

April 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm Slazenger. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to The Big Bang Theory— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 02:22, 23 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

August 2015 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Nicotine has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nicotine was changed by 173.22.244.21 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957701 on 2015-08-21T07:26:04+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:26, 21 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nicotine with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 19:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please do not add original research to articles, such as what you did to nicotine. Please discuss your input on the article's talk page rather than adding it back. Thank you. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 19:17, 21 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

February 2016 edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Electromagnetic radiation , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

August 2016 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Atomic theory has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:39, 27 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

October 2017 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Electromagnetism has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:47, 2 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Electromagnetism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 18:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Materialscientist (talk) 05:36, 27 October 2017 (UTC)Reply