172.251.100.84

February 2018

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Philip J Fry / talk 05:28, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2018

Please refrain from changing genres without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Philip J Fry / talk 22:53, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This will be the last time warning, stop making random editions in multiple articles, all you do is withdraw references and change texts without reaching a consensus.--Philip J Fry / talk 02:36, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Philip J Fry / talk 02:40, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:172.251.100.84 reported by User:Philip J Fry (Result: ). Thank you. Philip J Fry / talk 19:57, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Edit warring at Mariluz Bermúdez and other articles

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. You made no response to a previous complaint at ANI. In fact, you have never posted on a talk page or used an edit summary. If you are unwilling to follow our policies and don't wish to communicate, Wikipedia may not be the place for you. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 20:24, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Philip J Fry / talk 01:47, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

See a new complaint about your edits at User talk:EdJohnston. If you don't reply, I intend to go ahead with a block of this IP as well as User:Alfredo Baila, which seems to be yours as well. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 12:07, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for Disruptive editing and failure to communicate. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per the above notice. You have continued after your previous block expired with no change in your behavior and no response to the complaints. EdJohnston (talk) 03:37, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Again

I see you have returned to the same, it seems that the blockade did not help at all.--Philip J FryTalk 20:08, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for Disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

See the above complaints, to which you have made no response. I see that your abuse filter log is full of reports that you are removing references. It is hard to see any good faith in this behavior. You've been blocked twice before since March, for edit warring or disruptive editing. EdJohnston (talk) 19:39, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

---