August 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Win8x. I noticed that you recently removed content from King Noah without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. win8x (talking | spying) 21:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I explained it. Did you read the edit summary? Please answer Yes or No. 166.198.21.32 (talk) 21:50, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
I did. I just don't think you adequately explained it. Especially the "story book" part, which since it is a religious book is more hard to deal with. That's why I think, as I said in my revert, you should discuss it on the talk page. win8x (talking | spying) 22:15, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
You need to take it to the talk page, and bring a reliable source. It is against policy to revert for "I didn't like it". Please stop being disruptive. 166.198.21.32 (talk) 22:40, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
I've thought about it and it's okay, I'll leave it there. The edit was acceptable, but I just had disagreements with the summary. I shouldn't have done that. Apologies and have a good day! win8x (talking | spying) 16:10, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.