May 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Sundayclose. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of common misconceptions, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 00:12, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of common misconceptions, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 18:28, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

The citation provided was the Japan Times newspaper. This paper sources information from both Reuters and the Associated Press, and is rated as unbiased with a clean fact check record. 163.120.111.178 (talk) 21:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
You didn't bother to take 10 seconds to read the four inclusion criteria that you clearly can see if you open an edit window anywhere in the article. It's so big it almost jumps off the page. Click here and read. Your edit fails criteria 1, 2, and 3. You also didn't bother to read the edit summaries when you were reverted. Click here and here and read. If you do this again you will lose your editing privileges. Sundayclose (talk) 22:56, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 

Your recent editing history at List of common misconceptions shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sundayclose (talk) 18:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The kid who got hit By the stepdad edit

911 I need your help my stepdad just hit me he just slapped me right in my face and everything please come in my address is burn rd Magnolia Lake apartment 2600:6C5A:65F0:8770:6491:5DA9:F2BE:2505 (talk) 17:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply