December 2011

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Top of the World (The Carpenters song), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Phopon (talk) 18:56, 19 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your draft submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please take a look and respond if possible. If there is no response within seven days, the request may be declined. If this happens, please feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it when you believe the concerns have been addressed. (To resubmit the submission, add the text {{subst:submitdraft}} to the top of the page)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! DoriTalkContribs 09:45, 27 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

March 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm O.Koslowski. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Spooling, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, O.Koslowski (talk) 14:20, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

May 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Yintan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Anna Kooiman, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,  Yinta 13:49, 2 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Webclient101. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Better Luck Tomorrow, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Webclient101talk 02:15, 9 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Better Luck Tomorrow with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Marek.69 talk 02:16, 9 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

June 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Coasterlover1994. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Meagan Good, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 00:53, 29 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

August 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Callanecc. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Dhol (film), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:58, 8 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vijaya Nirmala may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • )1972 ''[[pamdanthi kapuram]]'' telugu

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:40, 8 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Flipped concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Flipped, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:30, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

September 2013

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Quilty. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jevansen (talk) 12:50, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vijaya Nirmala, you may be blocked from editing. Flyer22 (talk) 21:30, 8 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Information technology consulting, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Technopat (talk) 11:28, 12 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Foreign relations of Bhutan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • nations (the other is India) to have a residential embassy in Bhutan. Bhutan was the second country(after India to recognize Bangladesh after it [[Bangladesh Liberation War|gained independence from

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:59, 13 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

December 2013

edit

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 16:25, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Flipped

edit
 

Hello 159.53.174.142. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Flipped".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Flipped}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. MJ94 (talk) 15:11, 4 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Browndition (January 12)

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

 
Hello! 159.53.174.142, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gullavva concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gullavva, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:06, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gullavva

edit
 

Hello 159.53.174.142. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Gullavva".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gullavva}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:01, 24 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

May 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Florence, South Carolina because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. —MelbourneStartalk 14:42, 2 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Browndition

edit
 

Hello 159.53.174.142. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Browndition".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Browndition}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:33, 31 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) Media Viewer RfC

edit

You are being notified because you have participated in previous discussions on the same topic. Alsee (talk) 20:43, 5 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

December 2014

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Lambert W function has been reverted.
Your edit here to Lambert W function was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://finmathblog.blogspot.com/2014/10/some-special-cases-of-lambert-w-function.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:41, 1 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Recent edit to Union Carbide

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Union Carbide, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Kev (talk) 10:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

April 2015

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Gunther von Hagens, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Reify-tech (talk) 01:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Richwood, Ohio because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 11:44, 1 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2017

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:United States Air Force Pararescue, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 22:01, 23 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm KingAndGod. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Martha Cecilia seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. KingAndGod 15:51, 24 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

September 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Dan Koehl. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to 2018 Chicago Bears season— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Dan Koehl (talk) 19:05, 20 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

October 2018

edit

  Hello. Your recent edit to Manning, Iowa appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 05:23, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2018

edit

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Beasting123 (talk) 20:32, 25 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop adding unsourced content. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Beasting123 (talk) 20:36, 25 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at People (magazine). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:59, 26 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
  To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. – Gilliam (talk) 05:18, 26 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Comments: Blocked for 1 week.

March 2019

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Chennai Super Kings, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Samf4u (talk) 17:53, 18 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Recent edit to Take What You Want

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! PATH SLOPU 13:57, 10 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

June 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Riverbend21. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Holyoke, Massachusetts have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Riverbend21 (talk) 17:48, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

July 2024

edit

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Douglas W. Shorenstein, you may be blocked from editing. Dinoz1 (chat?) (he/him) 15:20, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.