154.5.169.5

June 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lock (security device), you may be blocked from editing. --David Biddulph (talk) 00:59, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to ReCAPTCHA. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:59, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

@Oshwah: I need to add a computer question to your talk page. 154.5.169.5 (talk) 00:15, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Foobar. —zfJames Please add {{ping|ZfJames}} to your reply (talk page, contribs) 01:03, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:03, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

154.5.169.5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I did NOT do block evasion. My newer edits were there for a reason. Plus, I wanted to create a template that I believed is useful using the Article Wizard.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQL^{Query me!} 02:36, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

154.5.169.5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I will not vandalize Wikipedia again. Only user using IP. I will take these steps to be a good editor and follow its rules on enwiki. #I will think about an edit before I publish it. Publishing it may not be good, and I don't want this to happen to me. #I will think whether my idea is vandalism. Those may be blocked by an abuse filter. If not, I make get my edit rollbacked by ClueBot NG. #I will think whether other people find this information vandalism, confusing (which includes logos), unclear, vulgar, advertising, a soapbox-like, copyright infringement or trademark infringement. The software detects copyright infringement and we don't want our edit to be copyright infringement. I promised to myself that under no circumstances should I ever make abuse edits again. I will also not add block templates to the regular sandbox and only template sandboxes if I desire to. I would like to edit articles about electronics, programming, novels, science, grammar and spelling and words, forms of intellectual property, flags and many more. I do not edit under albums so much. I would edit under other namespaces sometimes, but not usually at this house. 154.5.169.5 (talk) 00:05, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Clearly trolling. Block extended, talk page access revoked. Yamla (talk) 11:41, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: I did my UTRS appeal with ID #21844 and the block expired. I revealed my IP address as 154.5.169.5 in the appeal. 154.5.169.5 (talk) 13:14, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Appeal 21844 does not appear to exist. Are you sure that's the right number? SQL^{Query me!} 13:36, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Wait a minute, I pinged Yamla and SQL responded? WHAT???!?!? 154.5.169.5 (talk) 14:29, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Ok, the number is 21824 (see the account's talk page). -- 154.5.169.5 (talk) 14:29, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

---