154.119.79.254

SummerPhDv2.0 is making Ownership of content having unsourced/unexplained changes to several gang articles, sitting on a 3RR warning and, so far, not discussing the issue. - 154.119.79.254 (talk) 23:10, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Your report at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism has been removed. That is not the place to raise an issue of the kind you describe. AIV is only for reports of obvious vandalism. You may file a report at WP:Administrators Noticeboard/Incidents, but beware of the boomerang. General Ization ^Talk 00:01, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:154.119.79.254 reported by User:SummerPhDv2.0 (Result: ). Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 23:22, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. I have repeatedly informed you that this type of report does not belong at AIV. Read the information above. If you persist, you will be blocked as clearly not here to build an encyclopedia. I'd suggest you spend your time responding to the edit warring complaint against you, as noted above. General Ization ^Talk 00:13, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Actually, that was my mistake: I misread that you had created another report at WP:AIV. I have restored your report at WP:ANI, though I still strongly urge you to respond to the edit warring complaint rather than pursuing a counter-complaint against the editor who reported you there. This kind of retaliatory complaint rarely turns out well. General Ization ^Talk 00:18, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Unblock notice

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

154.119.79.254 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

At first I had no source to a page, what didn't help was that the user was undoing an edit I clearly had a source too. Why was the link still shown in the see also page too? I also was trying to reply back to the questions but I had no time to get back resulting in getting blocked by Dlohcierekim. I did wrong the first couple of times but SummerPhDv2.0 did wrong too without the reference being in the reference content of the article on People Nation as shown in People Nation#Symbolism and they have used other IPs before. This time I want to add sources in my findings or less time being blocked for my doings. I don't want to do what I did earlier or at the start again

Decline reason:

Your IP was blocked as a proxy, just before I and another administrator were going to block you for disruptive editing and personal attacks. Acroterion (talk) 00:57, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

First time?

Does everyone get a first time or is it just me that I have to put up with it? Can you not block me as a proxy? Why did you block me as a proxy and why not for some short time? Why not? 154.119.79.254 (talk) 01:01, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Why not block me for disruptive editing and personal attacks? 154.119.79.254 (talk) 01:03, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

See WP:PROXY. You may not use a proxy to edit. Beyond that, you may not edit disruptively. If you wish to edit productively, use an IP that isn't proxied. However, as far as I'm concerned, you're under a 31 hour block for disruptive editing completely apart from the proxy block, and I will block any IP that appears with the same agenda during that term for block evasion. Acroterion (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

K. Can you block me from talking on this talk page? Would help.154.119.79.254 (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

I did not block this IP. I would have for disruption, but BBB23 blocked for an open proxy. We genearlly block prxies on sight.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:17, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

PS Unblock requests that blame others are frowned upon. One must address one's own edits. Acroterion is nicer than I by far. I would ave blocked for a week. Please understand edit warring and dispute resolution lest you again find yourself blocked.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:20, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

PPS what is wrong with this edit summary? And please provide reliable sources for your edits. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:24, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

To SummerPhDv2.0

154.119.79.254 has been blocked for edit warring/proxy editing. - SummerPhDv2.0 00:47, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

I wouldn't get too stiffy happy if I where you, you have vandalized before under a number of IPs before, look out for the admins and look out for others who vandalize your page or report you. Not just me.154.119.79.254 (talk) 01:28, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Given the above, I agree with Dlohcierekim about being too nice. The effective block is for 1 week, and if this keeps happening, longer. I'm protecting this page for that term to prevent more talkpage abuse. Acroterion (talk) 01:49, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Block evasion

See User talk:154.117.166.206. - SummerPhD^v2.0 02:32, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

---