February 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Paget Brewster may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Birdgirl, a recurring character on the animated series ''[[Harvey Birdman, Attorney at Law]]'' (and would play a similar guest character on ''[[American Dad!]]''.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:13, 21 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

May 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm SQGibbon. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Alex Karalexis because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! SQGibbon (talk) 21:34, 14 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kenny Florian. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. SQGibbon (talk) 21:35, 14 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2014

edit

  Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to San Francisco 49ers. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Gilliam (talk) 17:29, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Varsity team— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 03:44, 1 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 19 December

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 20 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

March 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm Bentogoa. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Mejía (surname)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Bentogoa (talk) 16:00, 10 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

July 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Phencyclidine may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • studies have shown that PCP unexpectedly produces substantial cortical activation in humans<ref>{{vcite2 journal | ]] [[acetylcholine]] (nACh) and [[of glutamatergic synapses and consequently impact synaptic development and plasticity in the brain.<
  • structure-activity relationship studies of PCP derivatives, and summarized in the illustration (.org/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:54, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Gilliam. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 08:22, 14 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm Bonadea. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Proximity marketing, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 16:36, 3 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
edit

  Hello 153.48.247.250, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to California Division of Juvenile Justice has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 17:04, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2016

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Maurício Rua. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 18:49, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Center for Construction Education and Research (March 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Decker was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
joe deckertalk 16:24, 30 March 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! 153.48.247.250, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! joe deckertalk 16:24, 30 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

April 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Julietdeltalima. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Tony Ferguson, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Julietdeltalima (talk) 19:29, 12 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

WP:ENGVAR

edit

Per WP:ENGVAR please do not "fix" spelling of words in English that are based on variations, like you did at Lake Hillier with Australian English. Debresser (talk) 20:23, 27 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

October 2016

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alex Iwobi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GiantSnowman 17:23, 9 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Magnum Force, you may be blocked from editing. Widr (talk) 18:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your draft article, Draft:National Center for Construction Education and Research

edit
 

Hello, 153.48.247.250. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "National Center for Construction Education and Research".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 13:01, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

June 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Anarchyte. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to PC Master Race have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Anarchyte (work | talk) 15:33, 23 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm ( ͡~ ͜ʖ ͡o). I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Professional wrestling holds have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ( ͡~ ͜ʖ ͡o) 23:33, 26 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Black Six, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:10, 7 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

October 2018

edit
 

Your recent editing history at National Football League lore shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jasper Deng (talk) 17:22, 11 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ronald Mallett, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:08, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

December 2018

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at William Mullholland. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:42, 15 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at St. Francis Dam, you may be blocked from editing. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:42, 15 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf(talk) 01:47, 15 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Unable to log in

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

153.48.247.250 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm not really looking for an unblock but rather a way to sign in. I am not the vandal(s) who have made the bad edits but the cookies containing my login info have been wiped. When I try to login, there is no "I forgot my password" link, the help link goes to a mediawiki link and isn't helpful. I would go to the Teahouse but obviously cannot edit there. I would appreciate any assistance. I do note that a six month block to an IP account that never saw a level 4 warning for vandalism is a, perhaps, a tad excessive. Pinging Alexf. 153.48.247.250 (talk) 16:37, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Editing from this IP address has been blocked due to persistent vandalism. If this was not you, then I suggest you request an account and edit as a signed-in user. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 17:43, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

June 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm BloodDoll. An edit you recently made to Emmanuel Okwi seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BloodDoll (talk) 23:07, 29 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

2020 Libertarian Party presidential primaries

edit

Hey, that's great if you are the organizer of an event for LP presidential candidates to partake in a presidential forum, however, the citation you have provided in the article does not corroborate your claim. If you can find a source about the forum, please use that, if no such source exists, it's best that this forum not be included in the article. Ghoul fleshtalk 01:12, 7 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Eagles247. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Template:New England Patriots roster have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Eagles 24/7 (C) 13:47, 18 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm JohnFromPinckney. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Deuel Vocational Institution, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You've tried adding the closure twice. What is your source? Can you provide a citation? Thanks, — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 20:32, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2021

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Deuel Vocational Institution, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Ah! It seems there's a pattern. — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 16:12, 5 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mia Sara, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:04, 20 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

September 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to George Jackson (activist)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Cassiopeia talk 03:47, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

August 2022

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  User:Ymblanter (talk) 06:59, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ymblanter (talk) 06:29, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply