September 2007 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Al Gore, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Smichae 17:52, 23 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to James Hansen. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. WDavis1911 17:57, 23 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

May 2008 edit

  Hi, the recent edit you made to House of Yahweh has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Crazy Boris with a RED beard 23:40, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you.   «l| Ψrom3th3ăn ™|l»  (talk) 14:57, 31 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

August 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Ray Romano has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. LaPianista! «talk» 21:29, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

September 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Tekhelet has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ŦħęGɛя㎥ 22:45, 5 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Recession has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. tutterMouse (talk) 16:56, 15 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

December 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Bowl Championship Series. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cardsplayer4life (talk) 00:02, 2 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

January 2009 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Kruk and Kuip. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DFS454 (talk) 18:01, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

October 2009 edit

Your edit to Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies constitutes vandalism and I have reverted it. Please refrain from such actions. Pdcook (talk) 05:44, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to University of California, Davis. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Alanraywiki (talk) 23:22, 27 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Johnny Unitas. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 23:26, 27 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

April 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Federal Standard 595. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--ja_62 (t|c) 16:39, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

July 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Salem University has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. elektrikSHOOS 22:22, 20 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

September 2010 edit

  Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Causeway Classic, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. --moreno oso (talk) 09:15, 9 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Women in Iran has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 18:30, 15 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

December 2013 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Scat singing, you may be blocked from editing. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 23:56, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2014 edit

  Your addition to Lane splitting has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:28, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

That citation came straight from a public publication ie...the California DMV Motorcycle Handbook !

It's copyrighted. Read it. And for example here it says "Copyright © 2014 State of California". You might be thinking of works by employees of the US Government, not the State of California. And even when you are copying a public domain work, copying without attribution is plagiarism, which is also not tolerated. In any case, Wikipedia almost never wants anything copy-pasteed. And we do not put how-to advice in any articles. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:32, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

July 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Norman Ornstein may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 2003. Retrieved 11 March 2011.</ref> Ornstein considers himself a centrist queue laugh-track).<ref name=neocon>{{cite news|last=Ornstein|first=Norman|title=My Neocon Problem|url=http://www.tnr.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:32, 24 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

July 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Burney, California, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:46, 5 July 2018 (UTC)Reply