August 2012

edit

  Hello, I'm EricEnfermero. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Vitamin B12 deficiency, because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. EricEnfermero Howdy! 09:19, 11 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2012

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

December 2012

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

January 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Denisarona. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Larry Emdur because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Denisarona (talk) 10:32, 5 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

March 2013

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dane Anderson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dane Anderson was changed by 149.135.147.3 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853507 on 2013-03-16T01:26:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:27, 16 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

April 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Madkayaker. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Robert Borsak, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, madkayaker (talk) 11:41, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Content of a business plan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ubiquity (talk) 17:27, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bar (establishment), you may be blocked from editing. ubiquity (talk) 17:29, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2013

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Death of Christopher Lane, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. It is for discussion. You action is most unhelpful in that it limits the discussion. Fiddle Faddle 22:06, 26 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Thank you for calling me a dimwit

edit

Your edit was vandalism. Whether you are abusive or not, that is what it was within the definitions here. If you want the article to be kept then argue for it at the discussion. Removing the notice limits the discussion. Whether I am a dimwit or not is hardly relevant. Fiddle Faddle 22:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Also, while you're free to call FiddleFaddle whatever you want and publish articles about any subject, in America, Australia or the general Internet, Wikipedia is not so cushy. There are quite a few rules about what we can and can't say, mostly can't. Constitutions only say the government can't limit our speech. As well as not being a newspaper, neither are we a government.
Thankfully, this means you can steal from us, risk-free. If you believe this article carries a message that ought to be heard, you are encouraged to download any version you'd like, and re-upload it on any of the billion other Wikis. You can even start your own Wiki, dedicated solely to this case. A big world, out there. InedibleHulk (talk) 04:04, 27 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:43, 27 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.