148.77.10.25

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the ones you made to Baby of the House. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

• Create new pages and rename pages
• Edit semi-protected pages
• Upload images
• Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (148.77.10.25) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Linking to inactive links

I see you've been adding vote citation links, which is fine, but I would wait until they're actually active. Snickers2686 (talk) 18:20, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Euro

I would like to thank you for your recent contribution to the Euro page, looking through the data it had been inaccurate for quite some time. Just a note, the more detailed an edit summary you leave, generally the less likely it is someone like me would make a mistake and quickly undo an edit for not having adequate explanation (especially if its a large removal to a good article). I see you've been making quite a lot of edits recently, and one thing that helps others assume good faith about your contributions (and to get more recognition for your work) is to create an account. Anyway, thanks again! --Voello _talk 22:30, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2024

Hello, I'm Pickersgill-Cunliffe. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to John Cusack have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:31, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rosie Duffield. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Czello ^(music) 21:15, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2024

Hello, I'm Guessitsavis. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to United States presidential vacations seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Signed, Guessitsavis (she/they) ^Talk 17:44, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

It appears there was some confusion as to the reason why I reverted your edits. The New York Post is generally considered by the Wikipedia community at large to be unreliable and overly biased, especially about politics. Please see WP:NYPOST. If you have a reliable source to support the claims you are making, you can and should add such. Cheers! Signed, Guessitsavis (she/they) ^Talk 19:47, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

---