September 2009 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sustainable living, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 23:15, 10 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

January 2010 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Loco-Motion, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Loco-Motion was changed by 146.79.254.10 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-01-19T16:48:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:48, 19 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page The Loco-Motion. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 16:50, 19 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

June 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Zima with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 18:06, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

June 2012 edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Palindrome with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ... discospinster talk 15:31, 1 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Eye of the Tiger, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 02:40, 10 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

December 2012 edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Washington Huskies football with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Recent edits to Dan Szymborski edit

  Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s). In particular, something potentially negative or defamatory about a living person needs a reliable source Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! DemocraticLuntz (talk) 00:32, 16 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

WP:PAID edit

You are obviously with PR for Seattle Children's. We have a policy, WP:PAID. Read it and comply. if you don't I will seek to have you blocked. Jytdog (talk) 19:49, 24 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

December 2016 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Idiocracy, you may be blocked from editing. Opencooper (talk) 06:08, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2018 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Bohemianism. Binksternet (talk) 19:15, 14 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

December 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Iliza Shlesinger—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 17:45, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

October 2021 edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Apple ID, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hillelfrei talk 15:58, 8 October 2021 (UTC)Reply