March 2017

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Push (Bros album). Please stop adding false information, including album certifications, to this and other Bros pages under multiple usernames and accounts.

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. Nqr9 (talk) 09:46, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply


No idea what going going apart from the abuse from Nqr9, Bros Push sold over 10 million copies can member Nqr9 Please provide why they dispute, can someone please investigate Nqr9 on grounds they abusing wiki and not allowing other to add content even though its fact.

To any administrator viewing this page, please take a look at the sock puppet page I have linked above for TomWatkins1970. This user has returned after page-protection on the Push (Bros album) page has expired, to again add the same false/exaggerated/unverified sales and certification claims. Consistent with the editing behaviour of this user, they accuse me/others who revert their vandalism of being vandals ourselves. They also use the same (deliberate, I suspect) poorly-worded English in their edit summaries and claims of being innocent, as demonstrated above. This has all of the hallmarks of TomWatkins1970.Nqr9 (talk) 09:58, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply


To all admin wiki was set up for all to use to allow everyone to added content this to include fans of Group who know more about the band than others. Content I put in is varied and can be found in both Matt and Luke autobiography, threw magazines such a smash hits, also threw other avenues. Member Nqr9 is from Australia is not a certified historian not do they have information to back up their claim for removal content. what we believe is Nqr9 has major issue with other members adding varied content. We also believe he has issues with Bros and that why he keeps removing content, this is Vandalism, bulling, and forcing their vues on other members their taking unfair advantage on other users, WIki is free for all to use not just the few. If wiki is stay safe members like Nqr9 need to be warned and told only remove content when they can prove the content is false up to now they failed to provided this.

Thank you for providing proof that you are indeed TomWatkins1970 with the unfounded claims that I am a vandal/abusing you for reverting your unverified certification and sales claims, and claims of supposedly being a "music historian"; although, interestingly, the time you claim to have been a music historian varies from claim to claim, unsurprisingly. Even if you were a "certified historian", that matters nowt, as wikipedia is about providing information that is verifiable and supported by reliable references. Claiming to be a certified historian and "know(ing) more about the band than others" does not suffice. Me being from Australia somehow makes my knowledge of Bros less valid? If I was from Timbuktu, it wouldn't make a shred of difference.Nqr9 (talk) 10:25, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply