144.133.198.32

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.

NSBHS Old Falconians list

Grumpy You deleted Sir William Broun, Chief of Brown Clan of Scotland, from list of Old Falconians, presumably because it sounds very suss. But verification is instant. Just go to current Sydney Morning Herald Obituaries where it is recorded including NSBHS On other hand, despite citation, James Morrison did not attend NSBHS. Try Barranjoey HS - —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 144.133.198.32 (talk • contribs) 10:22, April 1, 2007.

Hi there and welcome to wikipedia and such. Thanks for the link to Willy Broun, but could you please put this stuff in a better citation form, such as exact date, page number and publisher where relevant. Just copy the format I have used previously with the 'ref' tags. I will format the Broun one myself. But could you please do the same for:

Sir Anthony O C Trollope and Sir Anthony Trollope, both Baronets of Casewick (cited in Debretts Baronetage)

As for James Morrison, I didn't add him to the list, just found a citation for him. But that citation doesn't say which school he went to. Can you find something to pin him to Barrenjoey? In future you should leave a message like this on my talk page so I am notified instantly, otherwise you just have to wait until I stumble across your page, which I happened to do. And remember Wikipedia:Signatures.

Cheers. Grumpyyoungman01 00:35, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi Again,

I think we should leave James Morrison where he is until another alumni list claims him. It isn't too misleading because of the note that HS hasn't been verified. I think we should include people who attended a school on an alumni list, no matter how short a period, it can always be said that "Also attended" or "graduated from" and link to the other alumni list. So I agree with you that entry on the school roll is sufficient. Grumpyyoungman01 01:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

You placed your comment in an archive of my talk page and I subsequently moved it over, if you click the '+' (addition sign) on the top of my current talk page 'User talk:Grumpyyoungman01' then it automatically installs a heading that you put up the top and places the body of the text at the bottom of the page. I then get a funny orange box next time I log in saying "You have new messages (last change)".

On other matters, you must have a copy of the alumni list, or part therof, is it possible to send it to me electronically? If you are interested in my previous deletions and alterations to the list of Old Falconians, I suggest that you visit the history of the NSBHS page itself and look at previous versions. If you look back far enough you will see all of my edits and what I changed. You may find it handy. Also remember to sign your comments on talk pages by typing 4 lots of '~' (four tildas) after your comment. Grumpyyoungman01 01:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

More on Falconians

Hi there 144.133.198.32. If what you add is through your personal research, then don't bother sending it to me or posting it anywhere as I will see it all on the page as you edit it. I was only trying to ensure that all entries on the page either have a citation or the person has their own article. I originally deleted all entries which didn't have either, even though I accept that they are all probably genuine. As the list is now under control and well ordered I no longer feel the need. But this does not negate the neccessity on wikipedia to follow these rules WP:ATT, WP:VER, WP:RS. Even though in general I won't delete your entries, any other user may very well decide to delete them. And as you have done so much research yourself, it is fairly easy to refer to that by putting down editors/authors details, page numbers and publication details in

this sort of format: Old_Falconians#_note-59

rather than as: Old_Falconians#_note-60

Regards, Grumpyyoungman01 00:55, 22 April 2007 (UTC).

- P.S. If we can cover all of those bases, I would like to submit the article for consideration at Wikipedia:Good articles.

- P.P.S. 2. As an editing tip see Help:Show preview to use the preview function to more efficiently make multiple edits at the same time.

I accept on your word that were at one stage on the school roll. The citations I have reinstated attempt to assert notability. Citations are still required (although may not be found) that they also attended NSBHS. As along as the evidence we have is provided honestly with full disclosure, no one will be misled and no harm is done. All entries who went to another school should have "(also attended...)" tacked on the end, this also helps people who are compiling alumni lists of other schools as we are not working in isolation. Grumpyyoungman01 13:30, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Good Article and edits by Michellecrisp

Hi 144.133.198.32, Thanks for the FYI. If you want to undue an edit someone has made see Wikipedia:Revert. In regards to what Michellecrisp took out, just put it back in again. If they still disagree then that can be sorted out later on the talk page.

Donald Robinson sounds like a bit of arsehole, so I wonder why any school would want to own him anyway. Just for GA (as opposed to featured article) not everyone would need to be verified, just most. I understand that Who's Who relies on their information from its entrants, they supply the details which is why Donald Robinson's entry is not realible. We can still cite Who's Who, but ideally we would like a reference saying he went to NSBH and a school roll is not good enough if it isn't publically accessible. But, if we have a reference for all of the easy ones, GA won't be so stringent as to need a reference for tricky entries. It is sufficient if it is as good as we can get it. Grumpyyoungman01 03:51, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Identity of this ISP

If 1 person is editing the Old Falconians would you please create a unique identity. I'm not sure if 1 or multiple users are using 144.133.198.32. As Wikipedia says "Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users". Thanks Michellecrisp 12:17, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

This ip address has remained steady and consistent with edits to List of Old Falconians going back to March 14 2007.[1] All evidence points to this being the same person. As for being anonymous, many users on WP don't reveal their real names, not just people editing with IP adressess. I agree that anyone making such a large contribution to Wikipedia should register to make interaction with other users easier, but it is a personal choice. Grumpyyoungman01 13:21, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

False accusation of vandalism

dear Mr unsigned, Wikipedia relies on citated evidence. such belligerent tone of comment is not appreciated on Wikipedia such as "you do not understand". Accusation of vandalism is not following Good faith principles of Wikipedia. please reveal your real identity. secondly we need evidence that these people attended North Sydney Boys, they may be real but no citated evidence exists to say they went there. As for "You should not meddle with things you do not understand " I clearly understand Tony Steele has never ever represented Australia: http://content-aus.cricinfo.com/australia/content/player/7672.html Do you dispute Cricinfo? I do not believe if you've only represented the state for a few matches is notable enough for Wikipedia. please check your facts Michellecrisp 15:04, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

I only think Test Players who have earnt a Baggy Green cap should be considered as notable. Otherwise we will be debating this for every single school old boy or girl who may or may not have been part of a national squad for many sports such as rugby union,league, netball and cricket. It's a matter of consistency. Please create an identity for yourself on Wikipedia . Michellecrisp 07:53, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Not interested

Mr unknown, I am not interested in the UTS-BALMAIN Cricket Club. Please create an identity for yourself on Wikipedia, why the reluctance? Michellecrisp 10:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Conflict of interest with regard to Tony Steele

Mr Unknown, UTS Balmain Club is hardly a reference. it's dubious notability to say international but not tests nor ODIs. There is a definite conflict of interest of you so intently wanting Tony Steele on the Old Falconians entry which is violation of Wikipedia guidelines. How do I know he's a personal friend, there is no way to verify this because you don't even reveal your real name or create an identity. There could be several people using your IP address. Secondly, David Dix, Greg Burrow, Sean Spence, Andy Town probably don't count as notable old boys for the school they went to, so hardly consistent to suggest Tony should be up for North Sydney. Michellecrisp 06:10, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 01:47, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Mea Culpa fixed

Hi there, that was really weird! I tracked down the offending edit. When you removed {{erroneous}} you also removed the last bracket of the reference by mistake. I think this is what made the page go so crazy. I can understand the bits where the references went all over the place, but I can't for the life of me figure out why the Sports and Arts sections merged, given that nothing at all was done with those headings. Grumpyyoungman01 09:01, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

I christen thee - Bob

Hi there, as I don't know your name, and I don't like to call you 144.133.198.32 as that is where you live and not who you are and calling you "you" or anonymous is offensive/obnoxious so I will call you Bob, (even though I don't know your sex).

Hi Bob,

Very impressive research skills and effort. The dispute is no longer about Tony Steele's existance or achievements, it now comes down to something fundamental to wikipedia. What is considered to be noteworthy? Is what he did sufficiently notable to be in an encyclopedia? It is good enough for an encyclopedia of cricket. I'll give you an example of the subjectivity of notability on WP:

I think Richard DiNatale is notable, because he is likely to become Victoria's first Green Senator. But I don't think David Risstrom is notable, because whilst he almost became Victoria's first Green Senator, he didn't get elected and is not likely to be unless he is preselected in 3 and half years time. This puts him at a level of all other unsuccessful candidates. That is just my opinion though.

Back in the day before this article was split from the school page, Enochlau's opinion was that an entry on a list is notable if an article on that person is justified. Note that this is different from anyone actually wanting to start an article on someone.

• Athletes:

         o Competitors who have played in a fully professional league, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport such as swimming and tennis
         o Competitors who have played or competed at the highest level in amateur sports.

taken from Wikipedia:Notability (people).

That doesn't make much sense to me. I really don't know what decision to make regarding Tony Steele. I suggest that we discuss the matter at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket. Look for the heading Tony Steele on a school alumni list Grumpyyoungman01 01:00, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

website question

Sorry, I forgot about your question.

Yes website citations are acceptable as long you think the source is reliable. Give the link a title and an author or organisation if there is one, in brackets say (accessed day month year). And all is ok. If the link disappears, we can worry about that later. Let me know if there something more specific you need help with re citing web pages.

I don't understand your Bill Waterhouse question? Did I or someone else delete something? If so I can't remember and I can't see why you couldn't put "The King of Bookmakers" against Bill Waterhouse. So go ahead. Grumpyyoungman01 04:22, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

tony steele further points

Hi Bob,

I don't really know enough about cricket for any of this to make sense to me, which is why I didn't weigh into the debate with Michellecrisp. But all is sorted now. In fact, you can remove all of the extra info from the Tony Steele reference if you want, just a page number to the encyclopedia is sufficient, especially as he has his own page now. Up to you. Grumpyyoungman01 00:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Stuff and Restore

Hi Bob,

With the citation needed tags which I applied to entries that have their own page, ignore them for the time being. I was going to scan their pages for references there and then copy them over. They obviously don't need a reference for notability, only that they attended the school. But a notability ref is always helpful.

In regards to published school sources, I don't know. That sort of issue should be covered in Wikipedia policy somewhere. I've had a look, but I don't think it is covered. They are certainly better than no citation.

Tony Steele, here is the comment left on my talk page:

I've done quite a few pieces on cricketers and, seeing your discussion at the wikicricket page, I cut the Gordian Knot and did an article on Tony Steele regarding his first class cricket career. All first class cricketers are notable on Wikipedia, that debate's been done and dusted. I took the liberty of changing 'international' to 'first class' cricketer on your list because the status of those matches in New Zealand is confusing. Feel free to change it back though, it doesn't really matter either way. If you want to reference Tony Steele on your list of Old Falconians just copy the references (cricinfo and cricket archive) from the new Tony Steele page. They're the standard ones for cricketers on here. Hope this has helped! Nick mallory 08:30, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Nick, the change to 'first class' is a good distinction to make for the list. Extra thanks for the page! Grumpyyoungman01 00:21, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

He says you can change it back if you want. Grumpyyoungman01 01:15, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Old Falconians

Your latest answer prompts another question plse! What is it that must have a citation? School attendance or later achievement? I I ask because in case of John Prineas you want achievement 2 many entries have no citations at all! Were you previously saying that if every entry has a citation the article becomes a model itself for some type of Wikipedia recognition? 144.133.198.32 09:27, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Both A) school attendance and B) notability should have a reference. A always, but B is not neccessary when the person has their own Wikipedia article (as if they weren't notable, then the article would be deleted).

I put a fact tag on John Prineas because the wording of the entry sounds POV "world’s foremost authority on pathology of multiple sclerosis following 25 years of groundbreaking research at New Jersey Medical School."

"Were you previously saying that if every entry has a citation the article becomes a model itself for some type of Wikipedia recognition? "

Don't get hung about every entry having a citation. But if enough do, and the list is fairly complete, then it can be nominated as a good article or featured list, or something. Every would be fantastic, but such perfection would not be neccessary I think for wikipedia recognition. This may be confusing because sometimes I say everything must be referenced and sometimes I say not everything has to be. Theoretically everything on wikipedia must be referenced according to its policies, but it reality, only some things without a reference really warrant being deleted on that basis. Grumpyyoungman01 11:22, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Clive Evatt

"Clive Evatt (Junior), Barrister, doyen of defamation list in Sydney Bar, art gallery owner, founder of Leuralla Toy Museum in the Blue Mountains;"

I've deleted this one a few times. I think it is one of the tricky ones where references are frustrating re: school attendance and confusion with his Father. Did I ever place a citation next to it? Grumpyyoungman01 11:25, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Is this the same person?? Fort_Street_High_School#_note-0. "Clive Raleigh Evatt, brother of H.V., defamation lawyer, NSW MLA (ALP) (1939-1959), art dealer" -- Grumpyyoungman01 11:27, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Clive evatt

yes grumpy you are right - has been subject to lots of work and confusion in past but not to me who has met the person and knows just who he is! OK let's clear it up now. His father was Clive R Evatt from FSHS and a State politician. This is the son so to make distinction I put (Junior) which I believe was used in real life whilst father still alive. As for Clive Andreas Jnr his NSBHS LC was 1948. Sisters both notable. Brotherr in law Harry Seidler

More on Clive evatt

yes grumpy you are right - has been subject to lots of work and confusion in past but not to me who has met the person and knows just who he is! OK let's clear it up now. His father was Clive R Evatt from FSHS and a State politician. This is the son so to make distinction I put (Junior) which I believe was used in real life whilst father still alive. As for Clive Andreas Jnr his NSBHS LC was 1948. Sisters both notable. Brotherr in law Harry Seidler 144.133.198.32 22:37, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Is he the same person as referenced on the alumni list of Fort Street High? (only FSH is mentioned in that reference). Grumpyyoungman01 13:26, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

John Andrews

Grumpy plse reconsider the alleged over the top tag 'international' I put it to you that is not a vanity thing but a fact of life. That was his recognition within the profession at the height of his profession but now he has returned to live here it is perhaps in the past. Further background - even the most eminent architects in Australia do designs within Australia. There is just about no Australian architect gaining highest level commissions and numerous awards overseas. John Andrews is the exception. He is a giant within the profession. How can you say unjustified when the major works I listed are mostly overseas. And huge projects! Did you know Scarborough College in Canada was given one foreign award as THE BUILDING OF THE CENTURY? I have not yet got around to listing awards. Of course all this deserves its own entry! 144.133.198.32 22:47, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Ok, so he is a particularly renowned architect, that is still clear with the list of buildings. I don't object to the word "international" on vanity grounds at all, purely on prose and grammar grounds. The word just feels "yuk" to read, kinda like expressions such as "negatively impacted on". I didn't make my reasons clear in my edit summary as "over the top" is pretty ambiguous. "There is just about no Australian architect gaining highest level commissions and numerous awards overseas." - I think this can be conveyed without the word "international", but keep in mind that any use of the words "renowned", "eminent" etc are superflous on a list of notables, even if those words were coupled with "international" as a qualification. Grumpyyoungman01 00:35, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Titles

"any use of the words "renowned", "eminent" etc are superflous on a list of notables" Grumpy, with respect can I challenge you on this? Within a list of notables there are grades. This can be discerned by the astute by the details. The Regius Professor of Greek at Cambridge is at top, for example, compared to Professor of Greek at XXXX College in Mid West USA. But another approach to grading is by a title when justified. To avoid losing impact should be used sparingly. Example in Old Falconians; Dr Gilbert Phillips, unknown today, was in his day one of top 5 neurosurgeons in world with international fame in the profession. How does one convey that without use of words like eminent and renowned? 144.133.198.32 08:15, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

"Dr Gilbert Phillips, unknown today, was in his day one of top 5 neurosurgeons in world with international fame in the profession. How does one convey that without use of words like eminent and renowned?" - How would calling him eminent or renowned distinguish him from other people in a similar field who are eminent but to a lesser or greater degree? "Eminent" and "renowned" are both like the word "unique" there is no "very unique" or "slightly unique". These words to do not distinguish between grades of notability.

Even if we found a way to distinguish between levels of notability, then I don't think we should. There should be a bar of notability and everything below it kept out and everything above kept in. Finding where this bar is, is subjective enough, once grades come into it then there are potentially infinitely many bars. As a general rule someone's achievements should stand for themselves. Within notables there are of course grades, but we should not attempt to overtly reflect this as apart from being subjective, it is vague, even if an objective measure is used. I am thinking the sorites paradox. - Grumpyyoungman01 13:22, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Tony Steele

so he only played for Aust B? remember ICC never honoured Aust A representation as official international matches for official statistics. if someone plays rugby for Australia A it's not counted as a test. as mentioned previously a possible conflict of interest exists as you're friends of Tony. If Wikipedia is consistent then everyone who represented Aust or NZ at Aus A or NZ B needs to be included in wikipedia. Michellecrisp 06:28, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

web ref format and McWhinney parliament link

Hi Bob, With all of the NSBHS HSC 19XX things (I moved more than just Mark Aarons), I wasn't sure if you were just indicating the year that they graduated, or if that was a school published reference similar to the Leaving certificate. If you are saying when they left, it should be in the body, if it is a reference, give it its own reference tags to separate it from the other references. I noticed that you included that info with a reference from somewhere else, hence my confusion.

In general, if other citations cover both the fact that the entry is notable and that they attended the school, don't bother with a school published citation.

It doesn't matter how short or long a web address is, because if you look at my formatting changes, and you did the same in some cases, all web address should be given a title. With the organisation in normal typography and the specific page name or headline in italics. This means that the web address itself is piped.

The only reason that I deleted the McWhinney Canadian parliament link is because I couldn't be bothered to find the actual page, having done so for others already. So by all means reinstate it in full. Grumpyyoungman01 07:54, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Penultimate ruling on Tony Steele

Hi Bob, see my comment here for the penultimate ruling on the matter. If anybody wants to make the change away from a description of 'international' they need to first run it past Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket. Grumpyyoungman01 08:50, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Please create an identity

If 1 person is editing the Old Falconians would you please create a unique identity. I'm not sure if 1 or multiple users are using 144.133.198.32. As Wikipedia says "Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users". I prefer not to correspond with ISP addresses. Further anonymous messages maybe ignored. Michellecrisp 11:44, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

I repeat If 1 person is editing the Old Falconians would you please create a unique identity. I'm not sure if 1 or multiple users are using 144.133.198.32. As Wikipedia says "Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users". I prefer not to correspond with ISP addresses. Further anonymous messages maybe ignored. Michellecrisp 02:16, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

edit note in history

Hi Bob,

Underneath the editing box you will see this text: "Content that violates any copyright will be deleted. Encyclopedic content must be verifiable. You agree to license your contributions under the GFDL*.

Edit summary (Briefly describe the changes you have made) : "

Just underneath that you will see a wide, one line box. Type your edit summary in there. If you click on the "show preview" button under the summary box, then you will be able to see a preview of your edit summary as well.

I have noticed that Michellecrisp has made lots of edits to the List lately. I don't have time to have a look at all of that now (studying for exams). What I suggest that you do is leave the list alone for a week or so, until I get around to checking out the edits. In the meantime I suggest that you put any new additions to the list somewhere else. Such as on here, which is a subsection of my user page.

Don't worry about any deletions to the list, as it has happened all before when I deleted stuff and can be restored in whole or in part in a matter of seconds. - Grumpyyoungman01 06:29, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Obsessed

Man you're obsessed with only one thing, editing old boys. can't you make a meaningful contribution to elsewhere on Wikipedia? 210.56.68.154 12:10, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

agreed, wholeheartedly.

talk page messages

Hi Bob, I'm always happy to hear from you, don't stop giving me talk page messages! Wikipedia is filled with lots of editors who are always trying to do the best by the project that they can. Conflicts are inevitable and as far as conflicts/disagreements go, this one on Old Falconians is tame and curteous. Have a look at some of the recent disputes I have been in here and here. Don't burn yourself out with research. As a point of Wikipedia policy, anything that is contentious and does not have a citation tag is allowed to be deleted on the spot. In practice, many editors do not do this, unless it is obvious vandalism. But being bold is probably the single most important policy. Grumpyyoungman01 04:57, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Schools talk

Hi Bob,

have a look at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Schools#How_many_years_to_be_spent_at_a_school_for_inclusion_on_alumni_list.3F and add your comments. - Grumpyyoungman01 23:04, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

---