Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.

January 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to South Australian state election, 2014 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:52, 6 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

February 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm DavidLeighEllis. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Cabra Dominican College because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! DavidLeighEllis (talk) 05:11, 18 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cabra Dominican College with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. SeaphotoTalk 05:20, 18 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Cabra Dominican College with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. SeaphotoTalk 05:31, 18 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Cabra Dominican College. SeaphotoTalk 05:33, 18 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  SQLQuery me! 05:46, 18 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Proposed deletion of Brian Leppke edit

 

The article Brian Leppke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable musician. Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:37, 30 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Scott Danough for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott Danough is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Danough until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Suonii180 (talk) 12:52, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply