14.139.190.82

October 2011

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Transmission coefficient, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Alex ^{discussion ★} 13:59, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Indian Institutes of Science Education and Research, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 13:23, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2012

Please don't make a whole sentence bold (and clutter the page) Jemmis mno rules without giving a vaild reason for doing so. I have reverted your edit to the page. Let me know if you have a problem with this. Trytowearasmileeveryday (talk) 15:53, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Thermocouple, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:29, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Thermocouple. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Materialscientist (talk) 08:31, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alcatel-Lucent may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• in more than 130 countries. In 2011 it was added to the [[Dow Jones Sustainability Index]].<ref>[{cite web|title=Sustainability Index 2011|url=http://www.sustainability-index.com/djsi_pdf/news/
• Presentation_110908_Review11_ADDS_DELS final.pdf|publisher=Dow Jones Index|accessdate=08-09-2011}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:27, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to C. V. Raman may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [Tamil language|Tamil]]: சந்திரசேகர வெங்கட ராமன்); 7 November 1888{{spaced ndash}}21 November 1970) was an [[India]]n physicist, born in the former [[Madras Province]], whose ground breaking work in

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:20, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

February 2015

Hello, I'm Frosty. An edit you recently made to Rank (linear algebra) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Frosty ☃ 09:52, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

November 2016

Hello, I'm Ferret. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kubo and the Two Strings have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- ferret (talk) 15:50, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Genetic code has been reverted.
Your edit here to Genetic code was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fchem.2014.00015/abstract) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:41, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

December 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Denha. Elizium23 (talk) 02:10, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 02:15, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---