December 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Érico Júnior Wouters. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Teddy Ruxpin, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Érico Wouters msg 20:28, 18 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eric Snow. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize.   Tentinator   19:11, 21 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Eric Snow with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 19:17, 21 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

January 2014

edit

  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fire extinguisher, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:53, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
  To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:21, 4 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Comments: Blocked for 1 week.

January 2014

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Hammonton, New Jersey has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

March 2014

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Rectal corrosion (talk) 23:46, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

May 2014

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ace Frehley has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Recent edit to Wael Kfoury

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Wael Kfoury, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:19, 14 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

April 2015

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Phlebotomy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:33, 29 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

August 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Ford Focus— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:50, 12 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

January 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Allthefoxes. An edit you recently made to Cryoprecipitate seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --allthefoxes (Talk) 20:50, 5 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

March 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Group A streptococcal infection may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • and is often used as a synonym for GAS. However, ''S. dysgalactiae'' can also be group A.<ref> {{cite web|url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18305132|</ref> . ''S. pyogenes'' is a [[beta-
  • direct contact with [[mucus]] or sores on the skin.<ref name="cdc.gov"/> GAS infections can cause >500,000 deaths per year.<ref name="Cohen-Poradosu 2007">{{cite journal|last=Cohen-Poradosu|first=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

February 2017

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Ashok Agarwal has been reverted.
Your edit here to Ashok Agarwal was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://benthamopen.com/TORSJ/VOLUME/3/ISSUE/001/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:53, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

March 2018

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Memento mori. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 19:12, 8 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

April 2018

edit

  Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Aleksandar Pavlović (basketball). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Donner60 (talk) 02:54, 8 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

May 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Rubbish computer. An edit you recently made to Omega Psi Phi seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 12:02, 13 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

November 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Stewartsoda. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Man from Snowy River (1982 film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Stewartsoda (talk) 18:26, 14 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lorna Sass (January 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 13:26, 17 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 139.137.128.43! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 13:26, 17 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2020

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stephen Sinatra. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 18:19, 10 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.