May 2021

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  331dot (talk) 07:27, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

136.158.58.17 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'd like to be unblocked, because the main reason for me being blocked was that I edit with an IP and that the blocking admin is a dick for blocking me. Thank you. 136.158.58.17 (talk) 14:34, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Unblock requests containing personal attacks not processed. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 15:02, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You using an IP played no role whatsoever in my decision. Full stop. As the notice states, you were blocked for edit warring. 331dot (talk) 14:53, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Bullshit. 48 hour block for four edits? That's bullshit. Most people using an account would have been warned b136.158.58.17 (talk) 15:24, 2 May 2021 (UTC)y the admin the first time or given 24 hours max. That was a dick move from you. 136.158.58.17 (talk) 14:56, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Given your attitude I was tempted to make it longer. A 24 hour block is often too short as a user might go away for more than 24 hours before returning and not notice that they were blocked. This has nothing, 150% nothing to do with you using an IP and I resent you telling me what was in my head at the time. I would have done this for any user, even Jimmy Wales. 331dot (talk) 15:00, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
I am curious as to how you know so much about blocks. 331dot (talk) 15:01, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
You received two warnings which you removed. There is no requirement for a certain number of warnings. 331dot (talk) 15:03, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
You seem to think that blocks are designed as a punishment. Surely as an admin, you know that's not the case. I'm using an IP, protecting the article for autoconfirmed users only would have solved the problem. Little Hitler syndrome in full effect. 136.158.58.17 (talk) 15:04, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
I don't see why every IP user should be blocked when just you were edit warring. I'll leave this for someone else to decline, and possibly revoke TPA due to personal attacks. 331dot (talk) 15:06, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
If you're curious how I know so much about blocks, why not just ask me directly? 136.158.58.17 (talk) 15:24, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for long term abuse. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:50, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.