Hello, I don't quite know what to do with this. Around 2015(?) I did create the Meca Sapiens page under a pseudonym I had used many years before. When I realized this was not a fully acceptable procedure, I dropped the process. I didn't even know the term was published on Wikipedia until about a month ago when a friend looked it up. I don't even recall exactly what it contains or how to change it.

The Meca Sapiens Blueprint exists, it is published for at least 3 years and is available at Glasstree Academic Publishing. You can learn about it at sysjet.com/mecasapiens/blueprint. The project and blueprint are also listed in Research Gate.

There may be a number of queries about it these days because I was invited to participate in the coming AAAI Symposium on synthetic consciousness and my paper refers to it (http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2287/ ) paper-4.

So,this is interesting, it seems the way I included the term Meca Sapiens is being - rightly - contested but what it refers to is more real than most cognitive architectures in this (unorthodox) field. Also this is happening just as the term is coming into the mainline and will likely be the subject of increasing queries.

That's the story. I have a lot of respect for Wikipedia and will adhere to whatever you recommend. If you think the term is worth keeping and would like to edit its content, I will send you a complimentary copy of the Meca Sapiens Bluerpint. Yours, J E Tardy (aka J.T Monterege) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monterege (talkcontribs) 17:22, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply