October 2011

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wallace Shawn, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

December 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Educational psychology with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Igoldste (talk) 08:13, 11 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Educational psychology‎, you may be blocked from editing. hgilbert (talk) 13:36, 11 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

February 2012

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Survivor Philippines: Celebrity Doubles Showdown, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Feinoha Talk, My master 13:59, 31 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

August 2012

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Software development with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. O.Koslowski (talk) 16:29, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SORSOGON EAST CENTRAL SCHOOL (SECS), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:16, 27 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your article submission SORSOGON EAST CENTRAL SCHOOL (SECS)

edit
 

Hello 121.54.44.230. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled SORSOGON EAST CENTRAL SCHOOL (SECS).

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SORSOGON EAST CENTRAL SCHOOL (SECS)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin Let's talk! 15:37, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply