12.16.115.131

July 2023

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 17:57, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Twelve Tribes communities. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Grorp (talk) 02:14, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

This is rather harsh and over bearing. Something was deleted once that’s relatively new content on an article that has multiple alerts about its neutrality being disputed. If you don’t agree with the removal then revert it and most leave a message telling me why you think it should stay instead of just resorting to an arbitrary and overbearing accusation of disruptive editing. Why don’t you explain yourself here? What’s wrong with the removal I did? Why should it stay up? Why don’t you talk about facts instead of just hurling insults? 12.16.115.131 (talk) 02:30, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

This is the administrator attention you were asking for. Nobody was hurling insults. You're being disagreed with, that's all. Acroterion (talk) 02:51, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Acroterion (talk) 02:49, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

This is ridiculous. If you want to block someone for firstly contributing and then inquiring about why they were attacked for contributing (you are claiming this is me attacking), then do so. And everyone will know Wikipedia is full of miscreants who are there to push their biases and agendas. Do it if you dare. Then people will see this conduct and know they should stop donating. 12.16.115.131 (talk) 11:10, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Bagofscrews per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bagofscrews. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit _(blether) 17:33, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

---