February 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in USS Curtiss (AV-4), makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -MBK004 17:08, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard to read formatting, as you did in USS Curtiss (AV-4), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. We do not put The in front of a ship's name -MBK004 19:07, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to USS Curtiss (AV-4). If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. you are in violation of Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships/Guidelines -MBK004 20:22, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for continued violations of the WP:SHIPS style guide as well as disruptive editing by persisting after being warned multiple times. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -MBK004 21:11, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 'N Sync. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SQGibbon (talk) 04:57, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Chris Kirkpatrick. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SQGibbon (talk) 04:59, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

April 2010 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to North Sioux City, South Dakota, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: North Sioux City, South Dakota was changed by 12.129.246.4 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-04-05T17:21:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:21, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

April 2010 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Alorica Incorporated, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Alorica Incorporated was changed by 12.129.246.4 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-04-21T22:56:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:56, 21 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

May 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Talk:Jesus has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Sophie (Talk) 23:35, 28 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

July 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page BlackBerry has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tiderolls 02:48, 30 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

August 2010 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Alorica, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Alorica was changed by 12.129.246.4 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-08-04T19:33:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:34, 4 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

March 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Max Gerson, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 22:51, 29 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

April 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Max Gerson, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 16:08, 1 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bluetooth profile with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jsharpminor (talk) 02:14, 13 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bluetooth profile with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — anndelion  02:16, 13 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Temple architecture (LDS Church), you may be blocked from editing. This lousy T-shirt (talk) 20:06, 13 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cain and Abel, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This lousy T-shirt (talk) 20:07, 13 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jack Kevorkian with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 17:10, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

November 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Phone fraud has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 20:51, 25 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Seto Kaiba with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mato (talk) 22:55, 26 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Miniature horse, you may be blocked from editing. --Pitke (talk) 20:14, 27 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

January 2012 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. かんぱい! Scapler (talk) 23:25, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2012 edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Progressive Adventism, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 20:12, 3 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. DBigXray 21:10, 13 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2012 edit

I’ve removed some images that you have added to the Italian invasion of Egypt and First Battle of El Alamein articles, as they are not appropriate there; I've explained why on the talk pages.
In brief, they're anachronistic, so they do not accurately portray the period described. When you are adding images please pay attention to the historical accuracy of the the image you have chosen. Thank you, Xyl 54 (talk) 23:54, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

PS: Have you done this on any other articles, as they will need to be fixed as well. Xyl 54 (talk) 23:56, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

October 2012 edit

  Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Charismatic Adventism, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, DVdm (talk) 13:24, 29 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

May 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hidden Colors may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:34, 17 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

October 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm Gtwfan52. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Kennesaw, Georgia seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. in order to make the statement you made, it would need to be a quote from a reliable independent secondary source Gtwfan52 (talk) 16:41, 29 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm DavidLeighEllis. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Mar Roxas because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! DavidLeighEllis (talk) 21:19, 25 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mar Roxas. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Fraggle81 (talk) 17:27, 26 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2014 edit

Wikipedia is not a free web host, and using user pages to hold content for your own use, unrelated to work on the encyclopaedia, is not acceptable. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:46, 19 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

October 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm PlyrStar93. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Ignacio Risso— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 01:40, 6 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Raily Ignacio. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hamtechperson 02:02, 6 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

November 2018 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 18:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.