112.211.219.230

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Actually, you're at 4rr, technically.--Calthinus (talk) 02:14, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

How am I at 4rr? If you count my edits I only reverted you thrice, not breaking the three-revert rule and definitely not 4rr.112.211.219.230 (talk)

Because it wasn't only me you reverted, you also reverted this guy [[1]]. And then since I posted this message, you did it again [[2]]. Actually, in these past 24 hours, you have not let anybody else make an edit, without reverting them. You do not own the page. Cut it out, self-revert, use your own advice and make use of the talk page. Wikipedia is a collaborative project. --Calthinus (talk) 04:15, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

I have not suggested in any way that I own the page, I merely found their edits questionable, and like any decent Wikipedian, asked them to present their case (if they have any) on the talk page so we can work this out. If anything you have twice attempted to revert without getting consensus first for your challenged edits, which by the way undid something that was decided by consensus on the talk page. If something was decided by consensus, you need consensus to remove it112.211.219.230 (talk) 09:53, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Seems like you are right on some of your points here regarding the policy, however I am still not gonna self-revert because those reverts of yours that constitute the bulk of my reverts in the last 24 hours essentially violate WP:BRR.112.211.219.230 (talk) 10:42, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Just to be sure, I checked the types of WP:BRD misuse, and I don't fit any of them. I'm not a ninja, because I always discuss, and I am not a filibuster, because I, with my short responses, do not make ten-page essays full of trivial points.112.211.219.230 (talk) 10:58, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

No that is not how it works, you do not get to self-appoint yourself enforcer of your interpretation of BRD while violating 3RR, which is a core policy that cannot be violated for the sake of editing sanity. Rules must be upheld by everyone. Revert yourself.--Calthinus (talk) 17:02, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

No, this is not MY interpretation of BRD, this is the COMMUNITY'S interpretation of BRD;As I said above, I checked OUR page, which is not something I created. And I have a feeling that you are going to game the system by not participating in the discussion at all, especially with all the vapid points found in your responses over at the discussion. So no, unless you can prove yourself to be trustworthy112.211.219.230 (talk) 20:58, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Also, no, there are no core policies in Wikipedia because Wikipedia has no firm rules-see the 5th pillar of Wikipedia and Wikipedia: Ignore all rules.112.211.219.230 (talk) 21:13, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

No, you are wrong, many rules may be ignored, but if 3RR is not upheld, then our collaborative project falls into chaos. Behavior like what you have done is not acceptable and looking at the page history, this has been your behavior before I even touched this page. Since you have not even shown consideration of how this is damaging to our project, I have reported you here. --Calthinus (talk) 18:03, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

---