112.199.164.233

Your recent editing history at Christopher Layne shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Arjayay (talk) 18:09, 3 April 2020 (UTC)]

Can you specify on the biblio rule? Lots of writers have

bibliography. Stephen King bibliography https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_King_bibliography 112.199.164.233 (talk) 18:15, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Breach of 3RR

I suggest you undo your last edit, as it contravenes 3RR, as warned of above, so you are likely to be blocked. I have already pointed out WP:NOTBIBLIOGRAPHY to you, we do not want our articles dominated by indiscriminate lists of links, and delete them when we find them, If, as you claim, other articles have such lists, please inform me which, so they can also be deleted - Arjayay (talk) 18:24, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Can you specify on the biblio rule?

Lots of writers have bibliography. I am wondering how come there is bias against this writer Layne. Stephen King bibliography https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_King_bibliography 112.199.164.233 (talk) 18:27, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Steven King's biography provides links to the numerous articles we already have on his books. Your list is a string of External links, which we do NOT allow in the body of articles. - Arjayay (talk) 18:34, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

I have never heard of this rule. Is this real rule or fake rule? Are you making this thing up? Bibliography with no external links allowed, bibliography with external links not allowed? Sounds like B***S*** to me. The list is NOT a string of external links. It is the bibliography. 112.199.196.141 (talk) 06:11, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

I don't think the so called "linkfarm" thing applies to legit bibliography. It only applies to the external links at the bottom of the page. 112.199.196.141 (talk) 06:50, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Christopher Layne; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Capewearer (talk) 20:11, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Does this also apply to the other guy Arjayay too?112.199.196.141 (talk) 06:13, 4 April 2020 (UTC) This is a bibliography with links to outside sources, this is not a "linkfarm". The "linkfarm" "external links" rule applies to the links at the bottom of the page. It does not apply to legit bibliography. 112.199.196.141 (talk) 06:49, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I am reverting everything back and restoring the bibliography if no real rules or explanations are coming

Everything will be restored back.

I find there is abuse of "linkfarm" rule to suppress the legitimate work of Christoper Layne.

Almost all writers and authors have a very long bibliography page, somehow this doesn't apply here. Total garbage. Some drivel logic that Stephen King links to wiki pages. But those wiki pages itself have tons of external links. What poppycock logic is this?

Dean Koontz bibliography

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dean_Koontz_bibliography

H. P. Lovecraft bibliography

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._P._Lovecraft_bibliography

112.199.196.141 (talk) 12:20, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

---