Your GA nomination of Encyclopedism edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Encyclopedism you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 1990'sguy -- 1990'sguy (talk) 14:21, 22 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Encyclopedism edit

The article Encyclopedism you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Encyclopedism for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 1990'sguy -- 1990'sguy (talk) 08:41, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Encyclopedism edit

The article Encyclopedism you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:Encyclopedism for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 1990'sguy -- 1990'sguy (talk) 21:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

October 2017 edit

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Drmies (talk) 15:29, 2 October 2017 (UTC)Reply