June 2011 edit

Merge discussion for Dungeons & Dragons simulacrums   An article that you have been involved in editing, Dungeons & Dragons simulacrums , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. zorblek (talk) 05:36, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

May 2011 edit

=) It's no big deal) 10x for appreciation though. I'll try to improve articles for every x-men character after passing my exams. Leave other marvel heroes to you)) FreckleKaren (talk) 14:42, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

July 2011 edit

  Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to Fear Itself (comics), as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept unsourced material or original research. This includes material lacking cited sources, or obtained through personal knowledge or unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Wikipedia requires that all material added to articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 17:35, 5 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thanks for your message. :-)
Are you saying that the first passage you added came from issue #1 of Youth in Revolt, and the second passage you added came from issue #2? I just want to make sure I'm clear on this. Nightscream (talk) 01:21, 6 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
I apologize. From the content and the edit summary, it appeared to be a IP newbie adding unsourced material from subsequent issues without citing them. Sorry about that. Do you not use a username account?
And btw, what does the "(L)" next to Ultra Girl's name in the Calvary article mean? Nightscream (talk) 02:06, 6 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Welcome edit

Welcome!

Hello, 108.69.80.43, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Pass a Method talk 07:51, 7 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Eldanoth. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Pass a Method talk 07:52, 7 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You are supposed to discuss, instead of plainly reverting. Pass a Method talk 07:56, 7 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

What about this edit [1] ? Pass a Method talk 07:59, 7 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Reply edit

First of all don't reply on my talk page please. Reply here. Secondly, it is a reversion, because someone made it a redirected 5 days ago. On second thought, maybe my edit notice was premature. But i still think you should have discussed starting an article with BOZ Pass a Method talk 09:09, 7 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

MODOK, GHOST, AND FFF in Marvel Noir. edit

Pick up the book, or issue #1 and you'll see. (JoeLoeb (talk) 21:22, 30 July 2011 (UTC))Reply

"Fictional character biography" edit

Please see (and join, if you will) the discussion at WT:WAF#"Fictional character biography". Fictional biographies are not compatible with Wikipedia's most basic goals. More to the point of Wolverine (comics), that section isn't written up like a fictional biography (and that is a good thing). Section titles should reflect the section's content, and "Fictional character biography" doesn't accomplish that. As for "standardized", there is no standardization for this; these things are decided strictly on an article-by-article basis. I've returned the section to its more accurate (if a tad less poetic) title. --213.196.209.192 (talk) 07:57, 1 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

For your precise and useful edits to Eddie Brock :D Darkwarriorblake (talk) 11:33, 13 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Piscaethces edit

 

The article Piscaethces has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this fictional character passes GNG/NFICTION, pure PLOT with PRIMARY sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:57, 11 December 2019 (UTC) {{safesubst:#if:|== Proposed deletion of Morwel ==| TTN (talk) 11:52, 4 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Primus (Dungeons & Dragons) edit

 

The article Primus (Dungeons & Dragons) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 13:54, 6 March 2020 (UTC)Reply