December 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I noticed that in this edit to James P. Hoffa, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 01:19, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

The content in question "old-guard" is an inaccurate description of the Vairma slate. O'Brien and many members of his slate were in fact members of Hoffa's slate while running for office in the 2021 election. Since both slates had current members of Hoffa's executive board during the election, describing one as "old-guard" or "reform" is inaccurate and deceptive. Whomever added that paragraph on the election was partisan to the O'Brien slate. Additionally, adding O'Brien's action of terminating more than 80 staff members on March 22 is both factual and topical. 108.48.170.233 (talk) 01:32, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to James P. Hoffa, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 01:21, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to James P. Hoffa. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. LizardJr8 (talk) 01:25, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply