Public Wi-Fi IP address
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from this public Wi-Fi network's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. Thank you for your cooperation.

March 2020 edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

108.170.65.170 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Ok so I went on WiFi. Not directly blocked, but rangeblocked! Can I please have the rangeblock disables please

Decline reason:

This IP address range is not directly blocked. Disable your proxy/vpn and try again in 24 hours. Yamla (talk) 19:16, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

December 2020 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hurricane Irene has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:11, 26 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

February 2022 edit

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for block evasion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- TNT (talk • she/her) 21:07, 10 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

September 2022 edit

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for block evasion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:14, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

108.170.65.170 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is a community center, please do not block for a full year with no editing even with an account. There is too much collateral, and appears to have been used by an innocent user in 2020. 108.170.65.170 (talk) 18:51, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Based on WP:CHECKUSER data, I see no collateral damage here. An innocent user from 2020, if they ever existed, has moved on. Yamla (talk) 20:49, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

108.170.65.170 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

It literally says this is a public WiFi terminal for the MIYJCC in Plainview, NY. A hardblock(!) for a year on this IP will lead to extreme collateral! 108.170.65.170 (talk) 22:55, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Again, no evidence of this and in any case, it's not your concern. Yamla (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

108.170.65.170 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

That unblock review from Yamla was exceptionally unprofessional. (1) “not of your concern” it’s literally the IP we use OF COURSE it’s our concern. (2) There is evidence, provided in this edit. 108.170.65.170 (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I see no evidence that anyone other than you has used this IP recently enough to concern us. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 01:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

108.170.65.170 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Evidence of other users using this IP - [1] [2]. And these edits are within the last 3 years, which is pretty recent in a timeframe of US history. 108.170.65.170 (talk) 15:12, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

We are not concerned with the entirety of US history as a timeframe. Three years is ancient on the internet. Stop wasting the time of the checkusers, please. 331dot (talk) 07:39, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

108.170.65.170 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Its not wasting the time of check users, its appealing against prejudiced and honestly at this point borderline anti-semetic blocks. You are choosing to block a known Jewish community Center as a hardblock for a year and refusing to consider any alternatives. Three years is not a long time on the internet, which existed since 1969, or even Wikipedia really which existed since 2001. It doesn’t help that I have no idea who the sock master is, but this block is unacceptable and should be lessened. 108.170.65.170 (talk) 18:57, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This block is in place to protect the project, and given the behavior I see on this page, this block needs to remain in place in order to protect the project.

You aren't doing yourself any favors by making baseless accusations of antisemitism. SQLQuery Me! 19:31, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.