Your submission at Articles for creation: Insyde (musician) (May 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 01:16, 23 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 107.242.125.2! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (barksniff) 01:16, 23 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

July 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dream telepathy have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 22:11, 8 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shinsuke Nakamura, you may be blocked from editing. StaticVapor message me! 04:26, 11 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your help desk question

edit

You have responses. Medical articles have stricter sourcing requirements, and folk remedies and alternative medicine would definitely have to have good sourcing.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:25, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

August 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Kirbanzo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to D.O. (entertainer) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 18:53, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to D.O. (entertainer). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 18:59, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to D.O. (entertainer), you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 19:01, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at D.O. (entertainer). Alex (talk) 19:19, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

March 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Firestar464. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Earl Reisser have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Firestar464 (talk) 02:39, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Parentucellia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 03:15, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Press coverage, you may be blocked from editing. LizardJr8 (talk) 03:29, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Non-Internet email address. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:43, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours to prevent further vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:43, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.