September 2020 edit

  Hello. Your recent edit to Reform, Alabama appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Wham2001 (talk) 21:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2020 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Aptronym, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 01:04, 5 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2021 edit

  Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Robert E. Murray—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 03:22, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

February 2023 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tom Tomorrow. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 17:22, 3 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm GenQuest. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Wilhelm scream, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GenQuest "scribble" 16:20, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to George Friedman—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jalen Folf (talk) 16:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sorry you're not smart enough to understand it. 107.218.58.143 (talk) 17:46, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to George Friedman. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:48, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

It doesn't take original or reliable sources to point out that the United States and Japan did not fight a war in the past thirty years. It's not a novel synthesis either. 107.218.58.143 (talk) 19:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.