107.0.84.218

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucas desrochers (November 16)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:57, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello, 107.0.84.218! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:57, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

February 2022

Hello, I'm Synoman Barris. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Livia—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Megan B.... ^{It’s all coming to me} till the end of time 17:06, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Livia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Megan B.... ^{It’s all coming to me} till the end of time 17:08, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Livia, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Livia was changed by 107.0.84.218 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873505 on 2022-02-08T17:22:26+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:22, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Livia. Serols (talk) 18:11, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Hut 8.5 18:18, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Lucas desrochers

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Lucas desrochers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BuySomeApples (talk) 04:35, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Lucas desrochers

Hello, 107.0.84.218. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lucas desrochers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

November 2022

Hello, I'm Fuzheado. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to North Reading, Massachusetts—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Fuzheado | Talk 15:48, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Notification: Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Fuzheado | Talk 16:06, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

September 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bill Russell have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bill Russell was changed by 107.0.84.218 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951308 on 2023-09-15T14:34:12+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:34, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to David Portnoy. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 14:38, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

February 2024

Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to The Girl with All the Gifts (film)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 15:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

Hello, I'm REDACTED403. I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to University of the West of England—has been undone because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thank you. -REDACTED403 (talk) 12:20, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to University of the West of England. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. -REDACTED403 (talk) 12:32, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

September 2024

Hello, I'm Chiswick Chap. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Columbian exchange have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---