Naming supports of Pinker edit
If it's important to name some of Pinker's supporters, as you argue, then it's only fair to include some of the names of Pinker's critics. Would you agree?
"Pinker's critics are the one who have signed the letter. Their opinions are included in that letter itself and their accusation is included in the paragraph. Pinker's supporters are included only to counterbalance the opinions expressed in the letter and therefore maintain the standards of neutrality"
What I am gathering is that you think it violates neutrality to name Pinker's critics because they are sufficiently represented in the paragraph while his supporters are not. This is not true. Naming Pinker's supporters while excluding the names of his critics violates neutrality. So, there are two solutions and I suggest you name which one you prefer. First, Pinker's critics and supporters can be represented via cited links to the LSA letter and Mother Jones article, respectively. This is the solution I prefer. Second, Pinker's critics and supporters can be listed by name. Please indicate which option you prefer.
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |