Welcome edit

Hello, 조국, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 08:45, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

December 2016 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Twitbookspacetube (talk) 07:33, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at New Conservative Party for Reform, you may be blocked from editing. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 07:49, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you may be blocked from editing. Twitbookspacetube (talk) 07:53, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

New Conservative Party for Reform edit

Thanks for your concern about the New Conservative Party for Reform article! Actually, you were quite right to remove the speedy deletion template. You can't remove speedy deletion templates for articles that you wrote yourself, but you didn't write this one - that was User:Skbsjh. (I don't think User:Twitbookspacetube and User:Arthistorian1977 realised that when they added the template back again.) Feel free to develop the article if you want - given the amount of news coverage about it now, I'm guessing that it would almost certainly be kept at another deletion discussion. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 08:49, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

June 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Candle Revolution, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 06:57, 16 June 2017 (UTC)Reply